• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Say Hey Griz!

citygriz

Well-known member
Any season is a series of ups and downs, high highs and low lows. Even great teams lose games, and go through bad stretches. And when this happens, the boo-birds always come out. "Fire DeCuire!" "Hire an assistant with experience!" (Yours truly.) "DeCuire's teams can never shoot!" Blah, blah, blah.

So let's take a minute and savor what this team has down the past five games:

--Washington. Lost there by essentially one possession, in a game where the Huskies shot 21 free throws to our six. You're gonna get homered at Washington, everybody knows that. And yet our kids almost beat them, while holding them to a season-low in points.

--Riverside. Won a home game they should have won, 77-61.

--Irvine. Beat a team 86-68, that then went on to beat Idaho, 67-59, in Boise.

--Northern Arizona. Won a game they probably should have won, but did it by 19, with the usual homers as refs, against a team that lost two nights later to Montana State in overtime.

Southern Utah: Demolished them, in a tough back-end road trip, by holding them to 49 points, fourteen less than their previous low of 63 against Michigan State.

The result? In the Ken-Pom ratings (and I trust Ken Pomeroy more than any other statistical guru, both for his accuracy and for being up-to-the-minute up-to-date), Montana now has a ranking of 105, versus 109 for Idaho, 143 for Portland State and 229 for Montana State. This also puts us ahead of Wyoming at 107; Washington at 112; Oregon State at 125; Colorado and 138; Washington State at 164 and Cal at 176.

Translation: At this point in the season, Montana is the top-rated team in the Big Sky, and ranked ahead of six teams for the Pac 12!

Not to mention the numerous story lines developing with this team:

--Our defense. The Warriors are known for their speed, passing and shooting, but it's their defense that has won them championships. And while I'd be hard-pressed to compare their offensive skills to ours, our defense, both in its design and execution, is the equal of theirs, in my opinion. Sure we're gonna draw ticky-tack touch fouls, and we're all gonna wince when we see a Nicholas or an Akoh draw a foul while double-teaming a guard a mid-court. But I've learned to live with it, as a small price to pay for a defense that is nightmare for our opponents.

--Michael Oguine. A sure-fire NBA player, on defense alone, not to mention athleticism.

--Rorie. With Oguine, one half-half of a Pac-12 caliber backcourt.

--Akoh. Wow. Where's the ceiling?

--Bobby Moorehead. Fully recovered from a dismal sophomore campaign. This kid can play--defend, shoot, and--surprisingly--rebound exceptionally well. I'm loving his game.

--Nicholas and Falls. Watching the development of these two has been and will continue to be a joy. Bigs take time to deverlop, because they foul too much and have to learn footwork. Nicholas is still fouling too much, but against Southern Utah he made a drop-step move with a left-hand finish that was a joy to behold. He's gonna be awesome. As one Texas high school observer said, he's an SEC talent. As for Falls, I plead guilty in thinking he needed a redshirt year. Early on, he looked too skinny and absolutely out-manned at this level; now I can't wait to see him in the game. We know Montana was one of two schools to offer John Stockton, and urban legend has it we were at one time interested in Steph Curry. Could it be the third time is the charm?

--Coaching staff: I still wish we had one veteran coach, to mastermind the offense and help with late-game situations. But with DeCuire's defensive schemes, and this staff's ability to recruit, my faith in this staff has been fully redeemed. Having lost three key players--Anderson, Samuleson and Dorsey--and with only one senior on this team, and with Mack Anderson and Kelby Kramer waiting in the wings, I think we have to acknowledge the great job this staff is doing.
 
Good write up Citay - I as well am very optimistic - remember DEFENSE wins Championships!
 
Proud Griz Man said:
- sad that UCLA game was cancelled. It would have been interesting to see how the Griz competed.

Interestingly, this OC Register story says that UCLA still wants to see if it get the game rescheduled. Because UCLA figures a win would help its RPI, which might be a big factor in seedings -- or even getting into the big tourney -- at the end of the season.

Course, UCLA is assuming it would win in this scenario. Griz fans certainly don't buy into that assumption.

https://www.ocregister.com/2017/12/30/ucla-basketball-looking-for-another-date-with-montana/
 
grizonbob said:
Proud Griz Man said:
- sad that UCLA game was cancelled. It would have been interesting to see how the Griz competed.

Interestingly, this OC Register story says that UCLA still wants to see if it get the game rescheduled. Because UCLA figures a win would help its RPI, which might be a big factor in seedings -- or even getting into the big tourney -- at the end of the season.

Course, UCLA is assuming it would win in this scenario. Griz fans certainly don't buy into that assumption.

https://www.ocregister.com/2017/12/30/ucla-basketball-looking-for-another-date-with-montana/

It is rather comical that everyone from Alford to the journalist simply assume it'll be a win for UCLA. I truly hope this game does go off now, and TDC tapes a printed copy of this inside every player's locker in Pauly.
 
EverettGriz said:
grizonbob said:
Proud Griz Man said:
- sad that UCLA game was cancelled. It would have been interesting to see how the Griz competed.

Interestingly, this OC Register story says that UCLA still wants to see if it get the game rescheduled. Because UCLA figures a win would help its RPI, which might be a big factor in seedings -- or even getting into the big tourney -- at the end of the season.

Course, UCLA is assuming it would win in this scenario. Griz fans certainly don't buy into that assumption.

https://www.ocregister.com/2017/12/30/ucla-basketball-looking-for-another-date-with-montana/

It is rather comical that everyone from Alford to the journalist simply assume it'll be a win for UCLA.

Guess I didn't read it the same as you.
 
EverettGriz said:
grizonbob said:
Proud Griz Man said:
- sad that UCLA game was cancelled. It would have been interesting to see how the Griz competed.

Interestingly, this OC Register story says that UCLA still wants to see if it get the game rescheduled. Because UCLA figures a win would help its RPI, which might be a big factor in seedings -- or even getting into the big tourney -- at the end of the season.

Course, UCLA is assuming it would win in this scenario. Griz fans certainly don't buy into that assumption.

https://www.ocregister.com/2017/12/30/ucla-basketball-looking-for-another-date-with-montana/

It is rather comical that everyone from Alford to the journalist simply assume it'll be a win for UCLA. I truly hope this game does go off now, and TDC tapes a printed copy of this inside every player's locker in Pauly.

Reschedule the game to be played in Missoula.
 
Good write up citay. This hoops team looks as good as I've seen them look for a number of years. There is no doubt in my mind that Decuire knows exactly what he is doing. I am a little worried how long we will have him at the helm. He is going to be a hot prospect of a coach.
 
Great post, citay. This team still has a high ceiling.

It's statistically notable to this point that their shooting percentages improve as their overall floor game improves.
 
Good observations, citay. One other potential diamond-in-the-rough is Admir Besovic. No idea yet what he brings to the table, but I assume Coach D brought him in for a reason.
 
Akoh's free throws are getting better and better. Up to 68% for season. 62.5% is lowest in last 7 games, if you throw out his 1-2 against WA. 17/22 in conference play.
 
Oguine's a great Big Sky player (He seems to wear out the Bengals, among others), but to say he's a "sure-fire NBA player" is a big stretch. He's a 6-2, doesn't play the point, and is a career 43 percent shooter (31 percent from 3). Not sure where all of that "fits" on an NBA roster. I agree he's athletic as hell and plays great defense, and that might get him a developmental league deal and maybe, someday, a spot on an NBA roster. But "sure-fire"? Nah.
 
Bengal visitor said:
Oguine's a great Big Sky player (He seems to wear out the Bengals, among others), but to say he's a "sure-fire NBA player" is a big stretch. He's a 6-2, doesn't play the point, and is a career 43 percent shooter (31 percent from 3). Not sure where all of that "fits" on an NBA roster. I agree he's athletic as hell and plays great defense, and that might get him a developmental league deal and maybe, someday, a spot on an NBA roster. But "sure-fire"? Nah.

Agreed. I love our dudes, but there was only one sure-fire NBA player in the last decade in the BSC and he played in Ogden.
 
PeauxRouge said:
Bengal visitor said:
Oguine's a great Big Sky player (He seems to wear out the Bengals, among others), but to say he's a "sure-fire NBA player" is a big stretch. He's a 6-2, doesn't play the point, and is a career 43 percent shooter (31 percent from 3). Not sure where all of that "fits" on an NBA roster. I agree he's athletic as hell and plays great defense, and that might get him a developmental league deal and maybe, someday, a spot on an NBA roster. But "sure-fire"? Nah.

Agreed. I love our dudes, but there was only one sure-fire NBA player in the last decade in the BSC and he played in Ogden.

Let me amend that--NBA "talent," in terms of hops, quicks and defensive skills. But there are tons of talented players out there. It all comes down to the intangibles--desire, willingness to improve. Lotta hungry kids out there. Michael may choose a different path in life. So be it. But if he wants it, I think it's his, with dedication.
 
citay said:
PeauxRouge said:
Bengal visitor said:
Oguine's a great Big Sky player (He seems to wear out the Bengals, among others), but to say he's a "sure-fire NBA player" is a big stretch. He's a 6-2, doesn't play the point, and is a career 43 percent shooter (31 percent from 3). Not sure where all of that "fits" on an NBA roster. I agree he's athletic as hell and plays great defense, and that might get him a developmental league deal and maybe, someday, a spot on an NBA roster. But "sure-fire"? Nah.

Agreed. I love our dudes, but there was only one sure-fire NBA player in the last decade in the BSC and he played in Ogden.

Let me amend that--NBA "talent," in terms of hops, quicks and defensive skills. But there are tons of talented players out there. It all comes down to the intangibles--desire, willingness to improve. Lotta hungry kids out there. Michael may choose a different path in life. So be it. But if he wants it, I think it's his, with dedication.

Citay, the only way he makes the NBA is learn to play PG. With Rorie at PG and Falls being such a great distributor, I don't see Oguine learning PG as a GRIZ. Then again, his athleticism may allow him to play 2. His shooting would need to improve a lot for that to be a possibility.
 
Back
Top