Well they are 4-0 in conference, 6-3 overall, and will most likely be in the playoffs. That win isn't looking too shabby right now.
marooncoloredglasses said:They had one of the best players in the country on the defensive side who could also score TDs. Not too surprising.
Zirg said:marooncoloredglasses said:They had one of the best players in the country on the defensive side who could also score TDs. Not too surprising.
Who would have thunk that St. Francis would be the best team to come into Wash-Griz this year? But they clearly are,which says a lot about this sad home schedule this year.
Lorenzo Jerome is hands-down the most dynamic player that will play in Wash-Griz this year. He could do it all. 6 INTS, 2.5 sacks and 4.5 tackles for loss (as a Safety) and averages 29 yards per kickoff return. Oh yeah, he has way more tackles than Kidder too 52-39. I guess nobody double-teams him.![]()
kemajic said:Suggests UM could be competitive in the NEC this year; the BSC, not so much.
So 5th or 6th place is your definition of competitive. My definition of competitive is having a shot at being #1.AZGrizFan said:kemajic said:Suggests UM could be competitive in the NEC this year; the BSC, not so much.
Will you still feel that way when we're 5-3 in conference?
kemajic said:So 5th or 6th place is your definition of competitive. My definition of competitive is having a shot at being #1.AZGrizFan said:kemajic said:Suggests UM could be competitive in the NEC this year; the BSC, not so much.
Will you still feel that way when we're 5-3 in conference?
Then you would be wrong.HelenaHandBasket said:kemajic said:So 5th or 6th place is your definition of competitive. My definition of competitive is having a shot at being #1.AZGrizFan said:kemajic said:Suggests UM could be competitive in the NEC this year; the BSC, not so much.
Will you still feel that way when we're 5-3 in conference?
When there are so many teams that they don't all play each other, I am not so sure how representative the Conference records really are. They could be worse or they could be better than where they place. But yep, a 5th or 6th place team can be considered competitive. I am going to guess by your definition, you have never been very competitive.
kemajic said:Then you would be wrong.HelenaHandBasket said:kemajic said:So 5th or 6th place is your definition of competitive. My definition of competitive is having a shot at being #1.AZGrizFan said:Will you still feel that way when we're 5-3 in conference?
When there are so many teams that they don't all play each other, I am not so sure how representative the Conference records really are. They could be worse or they could be better than where they place. But yep, a 5th or 6th place team can be considered competitive. I am going to guess by your definition, you have never been very competitive.
HelenaHandBasket said:kemajic said:So 5th or 6th place is your definition of competitive. My definition of competitive is having a shot at being #1.AZGrizFan said:kemajic said:Suggests UM could be competitive in the NEC this year; the BSC, not so much.
Will you still feel that way when we're 5-3 in conference?
When there are so many teams that they don't all play each other, I am not so sure how representative the Conference records really are.
brewskis said:Their RB would be on our 2-deep and Lorenzo Jerome would be first team all conference in the Big Sky.
FUKK I'd give my left nut for a safety like Jerome.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
reinell30 said:So is this thread saying we would lose to this team if we played them now at their home or is it saying we would win at their home? Or, is it saying they would beat us at our home now? Or is it saying it would be another competitive game?
When I read this thread I read, "wow look at them now, they were tough and are now 6-3."
Then I read, "wow look at them now, we beat this weak team and they are 6-3."
What is this thread about? Contradiction?
HookedonGriz said:reinell30 said:So is this thread saying we would lose to this team if we played them now at their home or is it saying we would win at their home? Or, is it saying they would beat us at our home now? Or is it saying it would be another competitive game?
When I read this thread I read, "wow look at them now, they were tough and are now 6-3."
Then I read, "wow look at them now, we beat this weak team and they are 6-3."
What is this thread about? Contradiction?
This thread, at least when I posted it, was to say that the SFU team so many thought were weak when we played them will be a playoff team. What many thought was probably a weak win will turn out a quality one