• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Possibly one of the biggest decisions for the defense

BWahlberg

Well-known member
DONOR
So for a few days I've been stewing on a very big decision Ty Gregorak and his assistant coaches need to make this year. While there are lots of important parts to their process, the system, and getting the right players into the depth chart he's staring at what I see as a bit of a condundrum.

Already this spring we've heard over and over that this is the best linebacker corps, top to bottom, in the Big Sky, the 'backers are a group that will be the glue that holds the defense together and feature the most returning experience of any other defensive position. Meanwhile we've got the D-line that is featuring a ton of fresh faces but does feature a solid and experienced pass rusher in Harris and two rising star DTs in Bienemann and Takai.

So you're the DC, you can only pick one grouping of 4 players to be on the field at once, do you choose:

1. A 3-4 defense that allows you to have JP Kanongata'a, Josh Stuberg, Brock Coyle, and Jordan Tripp on the field all at once, or;

2. A 4-3 defense that allows you to have Josh Harris, Alex Bienemann, Tonga Takai, and either Zach Wagenmann, Derek Crittenden, or maybe even Kaleb Kidder out there?

I believe of the possible grouping a 3-4 defense puts the maximum amount of "the best players" on the field, however it changes the team dynamic and a lot of the system the team has run. Of the front 7 I like the looks of having those 4 LBs plus Harris, Takai, and Bienemann rather than having to use Coyle as a sub-in and going with the traditional 4-3 defense we've seen here. A system change can be challenging, I know the team has mixes and has looked at both sets.
 
Does it have to be an either--or? I would expect the coaches to have defensive schemes that employ both looks and use them situationally. There are worse problems to have, no?
 
grizpaws said:
Does it have to be an either--or? I would expect the coaches to have defensive schemes that employ both looks and use them situationally. There are worse problems to have, no?
Agree; a lot depends on the O you are facing that week. I think they will be prepared to use both.
 
grizcountry420 said:
3-4 scheme would be great if our front 3 could get to the quaterback..

Good point, thats a concern I have b/c Harris is our best returning pass-rusher and will putting him in the 3-4 just kill that? On the other side both JP and Tripp are excellent blitzers, but can you rely on that?
 
I was a bit concerned/surprised watching the final Spring scrimmage. The offense looked fantastic and the defense was lacking to say the least, when normally it's just the opposite for this time of year. Does this reflect on a less experienced D or am I just hallucinating?
 
BWahlberg said:
grizcountry420 said:
3-4 scheme would be great if our front 3 could get to the quaterback..

Good point, thats a concern I have b/c Harris is our best returning pass-rusher and will putting him in the 3-4 just kill that? On the other side both JP and Tripp are excellent blitzers, but can you rely on that?

It will be very interesting to see how well Kaleb Kidder performs in practice this fall. You might throw him on the other side of Harris. Kaleb definitely has a bright future a head of him.. Big kid too! He was a man amongst boys playing in HS..

I also thought i heard Gregorak tell him he better be ready to play this fall....
 
BWahlberg said:
Already this spring we've heard over and over that this is the best linebacker corps, top to bottom, in the Big Sky,

yeah, i've heard people saying that, but i'd say we're one of the best. u.n.c. and m.s.u. both have equally good lb crews at this point.
 
Your goal should always be to maximize the strengths of your team, and for this reason I believe we will see mostly a 3-4 scheme this year. Another aspect of the 3-4 that makes me believe this is that it involves sending a different backer on the blitz almost every snap. This creates more confusion and can force the QB to read the coverage a split second longer, which could very well help give our inexperienced corners a chance to get back into position if the receivers beat them.

That being said, I would expect to see a decent amount of the 4-3 against run based teams but for the most part, we would be best with 4 backers on the field this year.
 
getgrizzy said:
BWahlberg said:
Already this spring we've heard over and over that this is the best linebacker corps, top to bottom, in the Big Sky,

yeah, i've heard people saying that, but i'd say we're one of the best. u.n.c. and m.s.u. both have equally good lb crews at this point.

but..but.. UNC got a 12 star transfer that can walk on water... :D
 
Back
Top