• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

poll: would you travel to the BSC neutral site?

weberwildcat

Well-known member
poll: would you travel to the BSC neutral site?
http://www.bigskyfans.com/wildcats/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4991" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

poll is actually on weber board but wondering what other sky fans think...
 
You know how I voted. I would go to Billings, but don't have the time/money to go to other sites. I prefer the current setup. I think a neutral site does a disservice to the students, because you know the students ain't gonna travel to see their team, and they are one of the best things about a championship game. So keep it as is, please.
 
PeauxRouge said:
You know how I voted. I would go to Billings, but don't have the time/money to go to other sites. I prefer the current setup. I think a neutral site does a disservice to the students, because you know the students ain't gonna travel to see their team, and they are one of the best things about a championship game. So keep it as is, please.

I'm pretty sure Travis would come up good incentive for the students to travel, if it were in Spokane or Billings. I heard he managed to get quite a few tickets for students to travel to Bozeman this year. I hear he interacts with the student body well, and he is well liked. :thumb:

I will admit the atmosphere is better if the conference champion hosts, in most cases. I say most because, a few of the schools have too small and/or bad facilities. :thumb:
 
I support the conference champion keeping the tournament on site. Neutral sites will take away the student/college feel.

If not....Reno or (why not?) Las Vegas. Billings, Ogden and Spokane aren't and won't truly be neutral.
 
MT Jack said:
I support the conference champion keeping the tournament on site. Neutral sites will take away the student/college feel.

If not....Reno or (why not?) Las Vegas. Billings, Ogden and Spokane aren't and won't truly be neutral.

The process is not to find a neutral site, it is to find a predetermined site.
 
The more I analyze this, the more and more I think that Billings is going to be awarded the tournament.

If the point of this exercise is to contain costs, then avoiding airports for team travel is the #1 way to do that I think. I count 8 teams that would likely bus to Billings. I could be wrong but I think that includes Weber who is probably right on the line as to whether they would fly or bus that distance of 525 miles.

If they do fly, Billings has direct flights not only to SLC, but also to Portland. I'm not sure if althletic departments are able to use an airline like Allegiant very often, but if they can Billings has service to both Vegas and Phoenix which SUU and NAU could both theoretically utilize if they were creative.

I am going to guess that attendance would be similar to what it has been in Missoula in recent years ranging between 4,000-7,000 for any game that either UM or MSU participated in. If the Griz and Cats met during the tournament, there would be the potential for 10,000+ at that game.

Lastly, if the presidents are set on making this change, I think Fullerton is going to push for Billings. He is on record as preferring to keep the current format, but as native of Montana, former MSU A.D., my gut tells me he'll probably think it is better off in Cat-Griz land if it has to change.
 
Cause it sucks. you gotta fly to Seattle or Salt lake first, then get on a plane about this big ...+ to get into Reno. Costs about $400 if you plan in advance, assuming you are confident your team is going. Conversely, flights to vegas from Missoula, Bozeman, Billings are about $100 and are direct. Just sayin' Reno is a bitch to get to from Montana. Might as well drive.
 
Back
Top