• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Option/Veer/Sweep...

Ashamed said:
Why even have WR's? Might as well just run the Frenchtown playbook from years' past. :?

I'm confused by this. TM was 14-17 for 126 yards...only THREE of those passes were completed to a running back....Hardy, Gratton, Warren and Henderson ALL had average YPC over 12....

We got exactly what we wanted in this game....we were running virtually at will against their defense, and the game didn't have to rest on TM's arm (even though he'd had great success up to that point as well). Sometimes shit just doesn't work out.
 
AZGrizFan said:
Ashamed said:
Why even have WR's? Might as well just run the Frenchtown playbook from years' past. :?

I'm confused by this. TM was 14-17 for 126 yards...only THREE of those passes were completed to a running back....Hardy, Gratton, Warren and Henderson ALL had average YPC over 12....

We got exactly what we wanted in this game....we were running virtually at will against their defense, and the game didn't have to rest on TM's arm (even though he'd had great success up to that point as well). Sometimes shit just doesn't work out.


+ 1
 
AZGrizFan said:
Ashamed said:
Why even have WR's? Might as well just run the Frenchtown playbook from years' past. :?

I'm confused by this. TM was 14-17 for 126 yards...only THREE of those passes were completed to a running back....Hardy, Gratton, Warren and Henderson ALL had average YPC over 12....

We got exactly what we wanted in this game....we were running virtually at will against their defense, and the game didn't have to rest on TM's arm (even though he'd had great success up to that point as well). Sometimes shit just doesn't work out.

That's a very good post, thanks. Facts are a bitch sometimes.
 
AZGrizFan said:
Ashamed said:
Why even have WR's? Might as well just run the Frenchtown playbook from years' past. :?

I'm confused by this. TM was 14-17 for 126 yards...only THREE of those passes were completed to a running back....Hardy, Gratton, Warren and Henderson ALL had average YPC over 12....

We got exactly what we wanted in this game....we were running virtually at will against their defense, and the game didn't have to rest on TM's arm (even though he'd had great success up to that point as well). Sometimes shit just doesn't work out.

Wow, maybe you got just what you wanted. I wanted a win.
 
mikegriz said:
AZGrizFan said:
Ashamed said:
Why even have WR's? Might as well just run the Frenchtown playbook from years' past. :?

I'm confused by this. TM was 14-17 for 126 yards...only THREE of those passes were completed to a running back....Hardy, Gratton, Warren and Henderson ALL had average YPC over 12....

We got exactly what we wanted in this game....we were running virtually at will against their defense, and the game didn't have to rest on TM's arm (even though he'd had great success up to that point as well). Sometimes shit just doesn't work out.

Wow, maybe you got just what you wanted. I wanted a win.

Yeah, that's exactly what I meant. :roll:
 
The fact of the matter is pass or throw we marched all over that throbbing hemorrhoid of a field. The problem was sometimes we forgot to make sure we were still holding the ball when the play finished. Sometimes we forgot which direction the sideline was and finished in bounds instead of out. The fact of the matter is EWU defense looked like crap compared to our offense run or pass but our own errors took a victory from us. Would I like to see the ball aired out a litte more, sure. But lets face it, the throbbing hemmorhoid got montana spike marks all the way up and down the field!
 
Griz Convert said:
The fact of the matter is pass or throw we marched all over that throbbing hemorrhoid of a field. The problem was sometimes we forgot to make sure we were still holding the ball when the play finished. Sometimes we forgot which direction the sideline was and finished in bounds instead of out. The fact of the matter is EWU defense looked like crap compared to our offense run or pass but our own errors took a victory from us. Would I like to see the ball aired out a litte more, sure. But lets face it, the throbbing hemmorhoid got montana spike marks all the way up and down the field!

Yep. :thumb: :thumb:
 
sorry but yer way way off with this one. more recievers is better. they need to do that play from madden where 5 recievers go straight out toward the touchdown and one of them turns out to the sideline. no way any team could cover that. trent would be drillin those balls down the field almost every play. imho he got one of the strongest and most accuret arms that a griz qb ever had
 
JAKEweezy93 said:
sorry but yer way way off with this one. more recievers is better. they need to do that play from madden where 5 recievers go straight out toward the touchdown and one of them turns out to the sideline. no way any team could cover that. trent would be drillin those balls down the field almost every play. imho he got one of the strongest and most accuret arms that a griz qb ever had


weezy we need you in the booth callin plays!!! Anybody that knows Rosey, lets get weezy in there with him!
 
Hammer said:
JAKEweezy93 said:
sorry but yer way way off with this one. more recievers is better. they need to do that play from madden where 5 recievers go straight out toward the touchdown and one of them turns out to the sideline. no way any team could cover that. trent would be drillin those balls down the field almost every play. imho he got one of the strongest and most accuret arms that a griz qb ever had


weezy we need you in the booth callin plays!!! Anybody that knows Rosey, lets get weezy in there with him!

Give that kid a pair of head phones, a red bull, and punch your tickets to Frisco baby
 
AZGrizFan said:
Ashamed said:
Why even have WR's? Might as well just run the Frenchtown playbook from years' past. :?

I'm confused by this. TM was 14-17 for 126 yards...only THREE of those passes were completed to a running back....Hardy, Gratton, Warren and Henderson ALL had average YPC over 12....

We got exactly what we wanted in this game....we were running virtually at will against their defense, and the game didn't have to rest on TM's arm (even though he'd had great success up to that point as well). Sometimes shit just doesn't work out.

Almost exactly HALF of those passing yards came on the last desperation drive though. :thumb:

You'll have to pass a lot more than that to beat the rest of teams on your schedule who have a better run D and healthier LBs than us.
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
AZGrizFan said:
Ashamed said:
Why even have WR's? Might as well just run the Frenchtown playbook from years' past. :?

I'm confused by this. TM was 14-17 for 126 yards...only THREE of those passes were completed to a running back....Hardy, Gratton, Warren and Henderson ALL had average YPC over 12....

We got exactly what we wanted in this game....we were running virtually at will against their defense, and the game didn't have to rest on TM's arm (even though he'd had great success up to that point as well). Sometimes shit just doesn't work out.

Almost exactly HALF of those passing yards came on the last desperation drive though. :thumb:

You'll have to pass a lot more than that to beat the rest of teams on your schedule who have a better run D and healthier LBs than us.

I HATE to agree with you, but exactly correct. Don't give a sh%t about how we ran up and down the field on EWU. I care about the final score. I also have to ask - when is TMac going to be ready to start airing it out. Next week, the end of the season, next year? The kid is not going to start making better decisions by handing the ball off or making a read on the defensive end. Start throwing the f ing ball down the field and open it up. We run into a team with a good run defense and the party is over. One dimensional is not getting it done. 0 -2 conference play. All you people calling for more of the same are smoking crack!
 
JAKEweezy93 said:
sorry but yer way way off with this one. more recievers is better. they need to do that play from madden where 5 recievers go straight out toward the touchdown and one of them turns out to the sideline. no way any team could cover that. trent would be drillin those balls down the field almost every play. imho he got one of the strongest and most accuret arms that a griz qb ever had
You really don't have a clue what you are talking about, do you ?? You don't have a clue about football..........
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
AZGrizFan said:
Ashamed said:
Why even have WR's? Might as well just run the Frenchtown playbook from years' past. :?

I'm confused by this. TM was 14-17 for 126 yards...only THREE of those passes were completed to a running back....Hardy, Gratton, Warren and Henderson ALL had average YPC over 12....

We got exactly what we wanted in this game....we were running virtually at will against their defense, and the game didn't have to rest on TM's arm (even though he'd had great success up to that point as well). Sometimes shit just doesn't work out.

Almost exactly HALF of those passing yards came on the last desperation drive though. :thumb:

You'll have to pass a lot more than that to beat the rest of teams on your schedule who have a better run D and healthier LBs than us.

Yeah? And 145 of EWU's yards came in the last 5 minutes. So what? You controlled the ball with the pass, we controlled it with the run.
 
Back
Top