PlayerRep said:
I don't agree with this statement from a prior post.
"Gwen Florio as the reporter or not, all of these stories of late would have been in the front page of the paper and that's not her fault - it's that of those who have created the need to write the article."
Many of the stories would not have even been written, ie JJ stories, had she not been around to write them. Multiple stories would not have been on the front page.
It is not the fault of the person who gets charged with a minor offense or even something he didn't do, like a dui, that the story is on the front page. It is the fault and bias of the reporter for making it a bigger story than it is, for the paper putting a racy headline on it and putting it further to the front from where it should be, and for the police/prosecutors pursuing and charging something that is smaller than what it gets charged with.
With Florio gone, there will be less front page stories discussing that a non-starter in basketball has plead not-guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct.
I could see the editor getting encouraged to move on sooner than later too.
I disagree, it's not just the methods of one reporter but it's the culture of reporting there. If it's "Grizzly" related and it's bad - it leads. Even if it's a kid that was on the roster for spring camp only it's front page news.
In many of the articles with the Johnson trial they would have been printed - however in the case where it turns out to be a wrongly accused man you can quickly go back and see the bias in many of the articles. Especially the first weeks worth.
Bobby Hauck talked about this after his first year at UNLV which I think was even before Florio was the main beat writer bringing up all things bad for athletes. I recall a comment about the press in UNLV not running a front page article every time a player runs a stop sign.
The biggest thing that is going to stop articles putting the program in a negative light from continually running will be by the actions of the student athletes to stop doing them. Secondarily the other thing that will hopefully help will be renewed reporting that is less biased and actually follows up and clarifies prior stories.
Take the Trumaine Johnson article for example. Yesterday his DUI charges were dropped in exchange for a reckless driving plea. The article lead-in "Trumaine Johnson Pleads Guilty to Reckless Driving" almost makes one think he did something else. The article does quickly point out it's in place of the DUI however they could have lead with that as well "Trumaine Johnson's DUI charge dropped, pleads guilty to reckless driving" Boom, better description and doesn't leave the reader wondering if he did something else. That kind of culture change is something I'm hoping for with the paper (but I'm not holding my breath for it).
However the ultimate thing that can stop these articles is no arrests/accusations. Easiest way to take care of it. DUIs, fights, getting busted with pills/narcotics are dumb things that a lot of college kids do - but these athletes need to realize they're under a microscope and even if they didn't do anything wrong and are unfairly wrapped up in something - it's going to come out looking bad for them initially. And right now with the way the paper works - the follow up and update clearing their name will not come.