• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

More on NBA Refs

cclarkblues

Moderator
Staff member
DONOR
Donaghy says refs fixed playoffs; Stern says noby FOXSports.com



Updated: June 10, 2008, 9:24 PM EST 902 comments RSS blog email print The Tim Donaghy scandal just got more serious.

The disgraced former NBA referee told authorities in a four-page letter released Tuesday that two officials conspired to fix the outcome of a 2002 playoff series and influenced several other post- and regular-season games.

The fix is in? Tim Donaghy did not mention which series in 2002 was fixed, but the Lakers-Kings Western Conference finals was the only series that fits his allegations. A statistical look at Game 6: Stat Lakers Kings
Halftime score 51 56
Final score 106 102
Free throws 34-40 18-25
4th Qtr. FTs 21-27 7-9
Fouled out None Divac, Pollard
Fouls 24 31
Game 6 officials: Dick Bavetta, Ted Bernhardt, Bob Delaney
Court documents filed by Donaghy's lawyer detailed the "inner-workings" of a plot in which top league executives used referees to manipulate the games. Donaghy claims two referees were "company men" whose job was to extend a playoff series in 2002 to a seventh game.

The documents did not name the series, but the Lakers-Kings Western Conference finals was the only series in 2002 that went to a seventh game, with the Lakers winning both Game 6 and 7 to reach the NBA Finals.

"Personal fouls (resulting in obviously injured players) were ignored even when they occurred in full view of the referees," the document says of the unnamed series. "Conversely, the referees called made-up fouls on Team 5 in order to give additional free throw opportunities to Team 6."

Two players from Team 5 fouled out in the game, the document said, and the "referees' favoring of Team 6 led to that team's victory that night." Team 6 also went on to win Game 7 of the series, according to the document.

NBA commissioner David Stern flatly denied the allegations Tuesday, dismissing Donaghy's allegations as a despearte attempt to ease his sentence.

"My reaction to Donaghy's lawyer is that clearly as the date of sentencing gets closer and the things he's thrown against the wall haven't stuck, he's rehashing a variety of things that have been given to the FBI, have been investigated and are baseless," Stern told reporters.

"He's a singing, cooperating witness trying to get as light a sentence as he can."


The Lakers trailed the Kings three games to two in 2002 when Los Angeles rallied to win each of the final two games and eventually went on win the NBA championship. Key Kings big men Vlade Divac and Scot Pollard both fouled out in Game 6.

Shaquille O'Neal scored 41 points and pulled down 17 rebounds against the Kings in Game 6, and drew most of the fouls that sent Divac and Pollard out of the game.

"Our big guys get 20 fouls tonight and Shaq gets four? You tell me how the game went," Kings coach Rick Adelman said after the game, according to SportsTicker. "It's just the way it is. Obviously, they got the game called the way they wanted to get it called."

"I knew before the game I'd be out of it," Divac added. "(O'Neal) went out (on fouls) up there (in Sacramento). It had to be the same down here."

Lakers coach Phil Jackson, speaking with reporters before Tuesday's Game 3 of the NBA Finals, stressed the need to wait for proof before any judgments are made, but was not shy to offer a low opinion of the officiating in the 2002 series.

"Was that after the fifth game, after we had the game stolen away from us on a bad call?" he said, referring to a game-changing play by Kings guard Mike Bibby in the final moments.

The letter doesn't name anyone involved. Donaghy's attorney and prosecutors have declined to comment. The league has denied the scandal goes beyond Donaghy and two co-defendants.


Must-read:Kriegel: Lakers need to stop whining
O'Connor: Arnie vs. Jack part II?
Vote for your favorite Yankee moment
Must-see:Rosenthal: Do ChiSox need Lofton?
Video central: Lakers-Celtics finals
View more videos >>Top headlines:Donaghy: Refs fixed '02 playoff series
Tigers ship Dontrelle to Class A
Big Brown trainer blames jockey
All of today's top stories >>Worth a thousand words:Griffey through the years

NBA Finals: Game 2 action
View more photos >>Donaghy also claims that a 2005 playoff series was improperly influenced, saying that referees were instructed to call illegal screens more strictly on a particular player after an opposing owner called to complain after falling behind 2-0 in the series.

Though the document again does not name anyone specifically, Mark Cuban did complain to the league that year about the officiating after his Mavericks fell behind 2-0 in their series with Houston. Dallas went on to beat the Rockets in seven games.

Then-Rockets coach Jeff Van Gundy claimed at the time that an official — who was not working the playoffs — informed him of the plan.

"I didn't think that really worked in the NBA, but in this case it has," Van Gundy told reporters after the fourth game of the series, according to USA Today. He was later fined $100,000, a record sum for a coach.

The document also described other alleged infractions, including league officials telling referees that they should withhold calling technical fouls on certain star players because doing so hurt ticket sales and television ratings."

Donaghy also said refs broke league rules by routinely fraternizing with players, coaches and team management and that the resulting inappropriate relationships may have influenced the outcomes of games. He claims one general manager in 2004 made a game-day phone call to referees to encourage them to call more personal fouls against an opponent.

Donaghy claims referees have accepted autographs, merchandise and meals from team representatives. He said one official used a team's facility to exercise and another played tennis with an NBA coach.

The veteran referee pleaded guilty last year to felony charges alleging he took cash payoffs from gamblers and bet on games. He faces up to 33 months in prison.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
[/quote]
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/11/AR2008061100102.html?hpid=topnews
"Official Misconduct?"
by Michael Wilbon
The Washington Post
6/11/08



http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/06/05/SP147361.DTL
"Nader urges NBA to review officiating"
by Chronicle Staff Report
SFGate/San Francisco Chronicle
June 5, 2002
 
lifesapuntreturn said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/11/AR2008061100102.html?hpid=topnews
"Official Misconduct?"
by Michael Wilbon
The Washington Post
6/11/08



http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/06/05/SP147361.DTL
"Nader urges NBA to review officiating"
by Chronicle Staff Report
SFGate/San Francisco Chronicle
June 5, 2002

Stern was on last night lying his ass off saying there was nothing to these reports. I am not buying what he is selling.
 
In my view, the NBA has asked for this sort of problem. I have been watching the NBA for quite a few years (almost forty) and as time has passed, the refs have been given more and more room to "interpret" the rules and make calls according to their "interpretation".

Traveling, palming the ball while dribbling, hand checking on defense and flopping all come to mind. In conjunction with that, players especially but also coaches, have been allowed to whine and complain after every call, endlessly, in what has come to be known as "working" the refs to try to influence them later on in the game.

The result of this behavior is now coming full circle. From now on, every questionable call made by a ref is going to have people thinking the ref has a vested interest in "interpreting" that call the way he did. Hopefully, there is nothing to it but now that doubt will be stronger than ever. Until the NBA and its refs get back to calling the game according to the rules as they are written and not according to some refs "interpretation", and until the players and refs are told to shut up and play/sit down, and that is enforced with technicals and ejections, regardless of the players' "status", then this will be a problem.

I liken it to major league baseball putting "umpire cam" or whatever it's called in some of the ball parks a few years ago. It is trained on the home plate ump and grades the accuracy of his balls/strikes calls relative to the strike zone as defined by the rules. It forced umps to call the game according to the rules, not according to their "interpretation" of the strike zone. They complained about it initially but you don't hear anything about it any more.

Questioning officials calls and the reasons for them will never stop, I understand that, but these guys have brought a large part of it on themselves, imho.
 
In my view, the NBA has asked for this sort of problem. I have been watching the NBA for quite a few years (almost forty) and as time has passed, the refs have been given more and more room to "interpret" the rules and make calls according to their "interpretation".


Perhaps they view the NBA rulebook as a "living document" as some do the U.S. Constitution.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top