Meloy striking out

[UMGriz75]

Now Kidston/Missoulian are running around saying he was found guilty of rape by UM. UM's assertion of a violation under the lower standard before it was actually put in place by UM, would be a huge negative for UM in any claim.

JJ just wants to play football and never hear about this again.

On the other hand, he has one year left to play football here.

The statute of limitation for libel is two years.

 

[getgrizzy]

she did, in fact, have a rape kit administered. she did, in fact, have marks on her body (bruised forearms and marks on her abdomen). she did, in fact, make the accusation not only to the police but several other people. those facts left the c.a. little choice but to proceed to trial. anyone saying the case never should've gone to trial is point blank talking out their ass.

Of course she told several people. She made sure of it.

If I am recalling correctly, and it's been while, but the relatively mild nature of the marks were found to be inconsistent with the passage of time before she had the exam. It raised the question that they were self-inflicted just prior to the exam.

It didn't help that she waited until the next day, and that she "stopped by" for the exam on her way to a Super Bowl party.

It also didn't help that her Mother didn't believe her.

I'd say to the extent that Fred may or may not have had all of that in front of him, if he did, he knew out the outset that the probability was high that he was going to charge an innocent young man.

After he retires, it would be an interesting interview.

If somebody really wants to write a book about this case, as I noted last year, this one has "To Kill a Mockingbird" elements to it.

oh don't get me wrong. i agree 100 percent. the only way that someone is convicted of rape is if the woman is beaten badly, dead, if there are witnesses or if the guy admits it. otherwise you have to find them not guilty, but we all know that a lot of them did it. we just don't know which ones. there's no way that every one of these women is lying. all anyone on here cares about is j.j. playing qb next year, so he has to be one of the ones that are being lied about. not guilty meant she made it all up and that j.j. couldn't have possibly raped her. of that we're certain, because it just has to be.

 

[PlayerRep]

Oops, wrong spot.

 

[UMGriz75]

oh don't get me wrong. i agree 100 percent. the only way that someone is convicted of rape is if the woman is beaten badly, dead, if there are witnesses or if the guy admits it. otherwise you have to find them not guilty, but we all know that a lot of them did it. we just don't know which ones. there's no way that every one of these women is lying. all anyone on here cares about is j.j. playing qb next year, so he has to be one of the ones that are being lied about. not guilty meant she made it all up and that j.j. couldn't have possibly raped her. of that we're certain, because it just has to be.

The better theory, of course, is to convict them of rape on internet forums, after they were found not guilty of the charge, after the State lost it's case based on the lack of credibility of the charging party, and proceeded to lose it on every subsequent witness.

Of course, that is the honorable thing to do.

It is something that an honorable person would do.

Is that you, Royce?

 

[Ursa Major]

she did, in fact, have a rape kit administered. she did, in fact, have marks on her body (bruised forearms and marks on her abdomen). she did, in fact, make the accusation not only to the police but several other people. those facts left the c.a. little choice but to proceed to trial. anyone saying the case never should've gone to trial is point blank talking out their ass.

Of course she told several people. She made sure of it.

If I am recalling correctly, and it's been while, but the relatively mild nature of the marks were found to be inconsistent with the passage of time before she had the exam. It raised the question that they were self-inflicted just prior to the exam.

It didn't help that she waited until the next day, and that she "stopped by" for the exam on her way to a Super Bowl party.

It also didn't help that her Mother didn't believe her.

I'd say to the extent that Fred may or may not have had all of that in front of him, if he did, he knew out the outset that the probability was high that he was going to charge an innocent young man.

After he retires, it would be an interesting interview.

If somebody really wants to write a book about this case, as I noted last year, this one has "To Kill a Mockingbird" elements to it.

Is Paoli Boo Radley?

 

[Ursa Major]

Who is the cardboard cutout? Jem or Scout? For Christ's sake, not innocent Dill!!

 

[signedbewildered]

I'd like to see everything come out of the shadows, but I think this guy has an agenda, and there would be no good to come from this 'book.' Might just as well have Florio as a co-author.

Unfortunately, right you are.....and be careful about what you wish for. Seems "Montana" isn't selling real well. She may need a partner in crime.

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Who is the cardboard cutout? Jem or Scout? For Christ's sake, not innocent Dill!!

Full circle. You are hereby commended.