So in your opinion, was he the leader of a huge drug ring, or is this a witch hunt to knock the mighty one off his throne?
'68griz said:Not to condone what he has apparently done, I think Armstrong still may be the greatest cyclist ever -- all the people against whom he was competing were doing exactly the same doping that he was, they just weren't as sophisticated as he was. He was, in my mind, competing with equals, and beating them every time!
Gaeilge1 said:I too will always admire Lance Armstrong. Having done a good deal of bike touring when I was younger I know how grueling this activity can be. Whether what Armstrong did was cheating I can not say when there is some question as to the exact nature of the prohibition of the practice of doping when he was competing. I do know that both steroid use and doping were rampant in cycling at that time. Did this lead to an unfair advantage for Lance Armstrong? I don't know. What I do know is that that allegation can not be proven.
This is the same problem that I had with the steroid scandal in baseball. At the time, it was technically not illegal. Was it cheating? Maybe. Was it widespread? Definitely. Did it lead to an unfair advantage? Again, unknown and unproven.