I think Idaho State is younger than Montana...UM has more total freshman, but ISU is really only using seven players right now....and the two leading scorers in the Big Sky are sophomores for the Bengals in Lightfoot and Doma.
ISU right now is starting two juniors, two sophomores, and a freshman, with two freshmen as the only main subs off the bench. The other five bench players are in order:
*A freshman who is awful
*A volleyball player
*A manager
*A senior who has a torn ACL and can't play
*A freshman who has a torn ACL who can't play
I'm not sure why everyone jumped off Montana's bandwagon in the media and hitched it to NAU, but you know barring disasterous injuries like in 1999 or 2000 or whenever that was, UM is going to be in the chase somewhere, even if they don't win the whole thing (and there was a five year stretch from like 99-03 where they didn't win it).
However, you have to give ISU serious props...there is no way they should be facing Montana with the rights to hosting the conference tournament on the line at this point with what they have gone through (losing two players to ACLs, and losing Molly Hays and their starting point guard India Soo after school had already started). Newlee has to be the coach of the year in women's hoops....I mean, folks thought NAU to win and Montana a close second....hell, in one poll ISU got ONE MORE VOTE than Montana State.....yikes.
All of that said....boy, I'm not sure ISU can beat Montana, but it should be a good game. ISU must play near perfect basketball to win...I would think in a matchup of these two teams playing 10 games, Montana wins eight, so I'm hoping this one and the tournament game are the two in our favor!
BBB