• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

JJ Trial

Thompson: to the defendant the sex was normal. No words. No talking afterward.
Duh, I've been married over twenty years and that sounds totally normal to me. What am I missing? No words. No talking afterward. No cigarette? Don't smoke.
 
JBS said:
missoulian @missoulian

Judge said the case defense cited said it is improper to characterize someone as liar. #johnsontrial But Thompson's use was proper.
Expand
Reply Retweet Favorite More


Paoli is getting his objections on the record. I would like to know if the above tweet is accurate or just a lot of Gweno. If it is accurate, then the judge is saying that Paoli is a lier.

I saw that to. So it's ok for the state to call someone a liar, but the defense cannot? I guess I just don't know what that means.
 
Roberta Sandolval @RobertaSandolva

I expect an acquittal in very short order. Don't be fooled by that buck-toothed douchebag. #johnsontrial
Expand
Reply Retweet Favorite More


These people on twitter now are very good at twittering. Do you think the above is talking about the accuser or Gwen or maybe one of the prosecutors?
 
While I expect an acquittal for the defendant and don't really see the evidence as close on the question of "beyond a reasonable doubt", I don't expect a quick verdict. Remember that until the moment the door of the jury room closes behind them, these jurors have not been allowed to express any opinion to other jurors or anyone else about the evidence in the case. So each of them has a lot to say. And given the gravity of the charges and the consequences of the outcome, they will take their "job" very seriously and carefully review all of the evidence that has been presented. It will take time to sort things out. In the end, I remain confident, that JJ will walk out of court as a free man.
 
Glendivegriz said:
Can not believe the Missoulian tweet stating prosecution asks the jury to follow them into the 21st century when considering rape. What a condesending and insulting statement to say to a jury.

They were quoting Thompson
 
wbtfg said:
lots of bizarre comments coming out on twitter today.
And they seem to me to be proof why you want women on the jury in a rape case. If this was a jury full of college girl twitterers, it would be over already.
 
JBS said:
wbtfg said:
lots of bizarre comments coming out on twitter today.
And they seem to me to be proof why you want women on the jury in a rape case. If this was a jury full of college girl twitterers, it would be over already.


No doubt. It's clear very, very few of them beleive the accuser. As I said earlier, you'd think that would be the prosecutor's wheelhouse.
 
...there iz no flip'n way...
...get ready for happy hour...
...and if thiz thing goez south...
...we break johnson out tonite...

... 8-) ...
 
zengriz said:
...there iz no flip'n way...
...get ready for happy hour...
...and if thiz thing goez south...
...we break johnson out tonite...

... 8-) ...

Post of the year nomination. :clap: :lol:
 
Sure hope this deliberation doesn't go into the weekend. The longer it takes, the worse for JJ I think.
 
Griz2k said:
Sure hope this deliberation doesn't go into the weekend. The longer it takes, the worse for JJ I think.
I agree except none of us should be surprised by a couple of holdouts who want to vote to convict. There is always the possibility of a few who are incapable of applying the "innocent until proven guilty" and "beyond a reasonable doubt" standards. It could be 11 versus 1 and take many hours to acquit.
 
NorthEndZoneDan said:
Forshizzlegrizzle said:
Will Missoula riot like its 1992 if Jordan is convicted. If so will you get me a TV Brint?

is an old RC b&w with rabbit ears OK?

Those are the types of TV's you throw through windows during a riot, Not the type you steal.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top