-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
JJ Trial
- Thread starter bluemarlin2
- Start date
Grisly Fan
Well-known member
Jeez EWU sure had better hope he was guilty because if not then he may have the basis for a massive settlement due to violation of his rights. Or maybe you don't have those over there? Take a hit from that legal bong and think about it for a moment...spokaneman said:
:lol:spokaneman said:
Yeah, it was really difficult for EWU to determine the appropriate course of action when the player was caught in the act of raping an unconscious 17 year-old.
stubbins
Well-known member
spokaneman said:
EWU was wrong...ruined a kids life over what? what someone else claims to have happened, without waiting for proof? Wrong. You can't start kicking kids off for everything, otherwise I'm going to drive down to north hedges in early april, beat the shit outta my new truck and claim it was a football player.
Pflu was right, UM was wrong, EWU was wrong...
I hope people start to use their heads....
EDIT: saw ummann's post above...two totally different situations. Ewu was not wrong in that case.
JBS said:
As opposed to say JJ's roomates who knew from the begining or the girls friends teaches etc who also knew from the begining or JJ 's roomates girlfriend or his Dad. All of whom gave informed testimony. The pharmacy student basically saying Well now looking back I don't recal her having problems There was no reason to think she should know anything.. Almost as stupid as Bell saying well looking back she had PTSD
Inland NW Griz
Well-known member
uofmman1122 said:
Come on.... Don't let the facts get in the way. :lol: He could have used Donaldson as an example too, but that wouldn't have worked so well..
spokaneman
Well-known member
stubbins said:
Good lord Stubby - you are an idiot....
So witnesses must know something from the beginning, and have been told by the accuser or the accused, to observe anything? This was a reluctant witness. You started this by labeling her, like you tend to do, and now are trying to defend what you said in some weird way that doesn't make much sense. Try being cogent, or better yet, stop while you're behind.tnt said:
fencer24
Well-known member
GRZFTBL said:Washington Post:
:shock:
EDIT: Colin O'Keefe @colinokeefe
The #JohnsonTrial has come to a close. Though most I see think he will, can Jordan Johnson overcome stats like this? http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/files/2013/01/rape_infographic.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; …
That is so much BS about only 2% falsely accused. One study that was published in a professional journal showed at least 41% were false accusations. So, who you gonna believe? Science or anti male activists?
PolsonGrizFan
Well-known member
found the same meaningless (no units, no timeline, blah blah) graph with different results
or there's always this one...
fencer24
Well-known member
Following Twitter and the comments here reminds me of the problem that all criminal defense lawyers have:
"If you think defending the guilty is hard, try defending the innocent."
The reason is, you make the State go through their paces and prove all the facts when they are guilty, and if convicted by a jury then the system worked.
But if an innocent defendant is convicted the system, and especially the defense attorney failed.
"If you think defending the guilty is hard, try defending the innocent."
The reason is, you make the State go through their paces and prove all the facts when they are guilty, and if convicted by a jury then the system worked.
But if an innocent defendant is convicted the system, and especially the defense attorney failed.
astutegriz
Well-known member
spokaneman said:
Does your college do this? This would be outright discrimination - denying based upon stereotype and not the individual. You can do it if you want, but if so, your college needs to stop receiving any federal funds or grants, and pay back the ones you currently have. They would have had to rep and cert they don't do this (EEO/AA/etc etc) - so there could be some jail time for officials who have conducted this fraud.
Or maybe your college is like the others, and you spew nonsense.
Well, we know unequivcocally that that is true.
Grisly Fan
Well-known member
The three things that Mark Twain hated the most: lies (e.g. Jane Doe's accusations), damn lies (e.g. anything posted by tnt), and statistics (e.g. Spokaneman's domain).
spokaneman
Well-known member
astutegriz said:
Oh Good Lord.... and you REALLY called yourself ASTUTEGRIZ?.... :lol: :lol: :thumb:
thanks for the laugh!!
