• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

JJ Trial

GRZFTBL said:
Washington Post:

:shock:

EDIT: Colin O'Keefe ‏@colinokeefe
The #JohnsonTrial has come to a close. Though most I see think he will, can Jordan Johnson overcome stats like this? http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/files/2013/01/rape_infographic.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; …

rape_infographic.jpg
I think the number of false rape claims is really low, but that graph has been widely discredited.

No one ones how many unreported rapes there are....because they're unreported.
 
GRZFTBL said:
Buttegrizzle said:
Incontrovertible proof! How does the Post know how many "rapists" are never accused...just wondering?

Good point. :?

There is a science called Statistics.. again, it is a science so not that you would ever hear that at a UM class, but just thought you should know!!
 
spokaneman said:
GRZFTBL said:
Buttegrizzle said:
Incontrovertible proof! How does the Post know how many "rapists" are never accused...just wondering?

Good point. :?

There is a science called Statistics.. not that you would ever hear that at a UM class, but just thought you should know!!

Based on actual numbers. Explain to us how you tally unreported rapes. We are waiting with baited breath....
 
spokaneman said:
GRZFTBL said:
Buttegrizzle said:
Incontrovertible proof! How does the Post know how many "rapists" are never accused...just wondering?

Good point. :?

There is a science called Statistics.. not that you would ever hear that at a UM class, but just thought you should know!!

Please tell us more! Enlighten us oh mighty one!
 
It was her opinion that Jane didn't act differently after the incident than before the incident despite her only acquaintance was socially. She didn't really know either of them by own admission. Her entire testimony by her own admission was in retrospect (memory.) She wasn't exactly one of the folks told...... She may well never have seen doe leave class or labs by her own admission wasn't in all of them.
 
spokaneman said:
GRZFTBL said:
Buttegrizzle said:
Incontrovertible proof! How does the Post know how many "rapists" are never accused...just wondering?

Good point. :?

There is a science called Statistics.. not that you would ever hear that at a UM class, but just thought you should know!!

Ah, Spokaneman is up from his nap. For statistics to be relevant you need data. The absence of which would be...this, just another visual representation of what is believed by someone to represent the reality. The only confirmable elements here would be 1) charged 2) convicted 3) exonerated. Even reported would be skewed becasue there is no database for reported. Reported to whom? cops, councilor, teacher, priest? No way to tally that much less the unreported....kind of like the old "silent majority"... No run along and play with Troll-N-Tool.
 
GrizPony said:
spokaneman said:
GRZFTBL said:
Buttegrizzle said:
Incontrovertible proof! How does the Post know how many "rapists" are never accused...just wondering?

Good point. :?

There is a science called Statistics.. not that you would ever hear that at a UM class, but just thought you should know!!

Based on actual numbers. Explain to us how you tally unreported rapes. We are waiting with baited breath....

Not that you really care, but there is an actual mathematical science that will provide you with statistical data...

Say for instance you wanted to know the odds of recruiting out of Compton, CA and that recruit ending up a thug.. one could put some statistical data together to arrive at a conclusion...

but again... that is stuff for the other State College.....
 
So navigating through all the tweets and e-griz posts court is adjourned for the day and resumes at 8:30 AM Friday for closing arguments and judge instructions to the jury?
 
tnt, you're clearly close to this case. Too close, I dare say, to be posting on a chat board about it.

And of course it's been clear since the day you joined the board (you big football fan, you!!) that you have a very clear agenda, and that in your mind Jordan Johnson is guilty no matter how thin the evidence is against him. I just pray to God you're not a juror. Or never will be.
 
spokaneman said:
GrizPony said:
spokaneman said:
GRZFTBL said:
Good point. :?

There is a science called Statistics.. not that you would ever hear that at a UM class, but just thought you should know!!

Based on actual numbers. Explain to us how you tally unreported rapes. We are waiting with baited breath....

Not that you really care, but there is an actual mathematical science that will provide you with statistical data...

Say for instance you wanted to know the odds of recruiting out of Compton, CA and that recruit ending up a thug.. one could put some statistical data together to arrive at a conclusion...

I'm sure EWU would have that data and you could check that out objectively. :lol:
 
spokaneman said:
GrizPony said:
spokaneman said:
GRZFTBL said:
Good point. :?

There is a science called Statistics.. not that you would ever hear that at a UM class, but just thought you should know!!

Based on actual numbers. Explain to us how you tally unreported rapes. We are waiting with baited breath....

Not that you really care, but there is an actual mathematical science that will provide you with statistical data...

Say for instance you wanted to know the odds of recruiting out of Compton, CA and that recruit ending up a thug.. one could put some statistical data together to arrive at a conclusion...

but again... that is stuff for the other State College.....
There's zero data for unreported rape claims.

Using statistics to make figures for this issue is exactly what the graph's author did, and it's exactly why it's been discredited.
 
griz71 said:
So navigating through all the tweets and e-griz posts court is adjourned for the day and resumes at 8:30 AM Friday for closing arguments and judge instructions to the jury?

Yes, that's how I understand it.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
tnt said:
Her entire testimony by her own admission was in retrospect (memory.)

As opposed to . . .

As opposed to knowing who she was from the days after and watching and interacting with that in mind as opposed to reconstructing her memories after the fact.
 
spokaneman said:
GrizPony said:
spokaneman said:
GRZFTBL said:
Good point. :?

There is a science called Statistics.. not that you would ever hear that at a UM class, but just thought you should know!!

Based on actual numbers. Explain to us how you tally unreported rapes. We are waiting with baited breath....

Not that you really care, but there is an actual mathematical science that will provide you with statistical data...

Say for instance you wanted to know the odds of recruiting out of Compton, CA and that recruit ending up a thug.. one could put some statistical data together to arrive at a conclusion...

but again... that is stuff for the other State College.....
I guess that we now know the statistical probability of an internet thug coming from Spokompton...
 
tnt said:
It was her opinion that Jane didn't act differently after the incident than before the incident despite her only acquaintance was socially. She didn't really know either of them by own admission. Her entire testimony by her own admission was in retrospect (memory.) She wasn't exactly one of the folks told...... She may well never have seen doe leave class or labs by her own admission wasn't in all of them.
Getting stupider by the post.
 
GrizPony said:
spokaneman said:
GrizPony said:
spokaneman said:
There is a science called Statistics.. not that you would ever hear that at a UM class, but just thought you should know!!

Based on actual numbers. Explain to us how you tally unreported rapes. We are waiting with baited breath....

Not that you really care, but there is an actual mathematical science that will provide you with statistical data...

Say for instance you wanted to know the odds of recruiting out of Compton, CA and that recruit ending up a thug.. one could put some statistical data together to arrive at a conclusion...

I'm sure EWU would have that data and you could check that out objectively. :lol:

Since you brought EWU up lets look at how each school ACTUALLY TREATED very similar events....

UM: Football player accused of rape. Coach praised him, went to AD to plea that he remain on the team until "convicted" of such charges, but was eventually suspended. Allowed to remain in school...

EWU: Football player accused of rape. Coach Immediately kicks him off team. University immediately kicks him out of school....
 
Back
Top