• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

JJ Trial

They are trying to show that the counselor who diagnosed her with PTSD did not diagnose it correctly because she had testified that she did not obtain the victim's prior medical history. If they can show that the victim most likely did not suffer from PTSD and was incorrectly diagnosed by this counselor and not diagnosed by two other counselors, it shows that her strange behavior may not have been caused by a traumatic event such as a rape, leading to reasonable doubt. The defense is only trying to instill as much reasonable doubt as possible at this time.
 
This argument about whether PTSD exists -- and whether it's a result of the alleged sexual assualt -- seems more suited to a civil trial.
 
GrizzleMoose said:
They are trying to show that the counselor who diagnosed her with PTSD did not diagnose it correctly because she had testified that she did not obtain the victim's prior medical history. If they can show that the victim most likely did not suffer from PTSD and was incorrectly diagnosed by this counselor and not diagnosed by two other counselors, it shows that her strange behavior may not have been caused by a traumatic event such as a rape, leading to reasonable doubt. The defense is only trying to instill as much reasonable doubt as possible at this time.
Yeah, I see why the did it. I am just not sure it was the best idea but who knows.
 
I don't think the mood needs to be lightened. There are two seperate worlds viewing this case through two different perspectives. Fans are viewing it through a football lense (some are looking at it purely as a matter of justice) and jurors, Paoli, and Jordy are viewing it as a life or death issue. In any case, I think we could all agree that football is appropriately a secondary issue.
 
Jerry Punch said:
I don't think the mood needs to be lightened. There are two seperate worlds viewing this case through two different perspectives. Fans are viewing it through a football lense (some are looking at it purely as a matter of justice) and jurors, Paoli, and Jordy are viewing it as a life or death issue. In any case, I think we could all agree that football is appropriately a secondary issue.

Yes.
 
If the defense tried to bring in testimony about the medication the accuser was taking, this judge wouldn't allow it.
 
...and another defense objection is overruled. :roll: Granted, I haven't read every single tweet, but I honestly can't recall this judge ruling in favor of the defense even 1 time (pretty much everything for the prosecution seems to be granted). I honestly don't believe she should be presiding over this case.
 
...thiz witness will prove important...
...when the defense makez itz closing...
...an show the jury the reasonable doubt...

... 8-) ...
 
mlbowl said:
...and another defense objection is overruled. :roll: Granted, I haven't read every single tweet, but I honestly can't recall this judge ruling in favor of the defense even 1 time (pretty much everything for the prosecution seems to be granted). I honestly don't believe she should be presiding over this case.
Maybe her and Gwen play softball together for the YWCA
 
mlbowl said:
...and another defense objection is overruled. :roll: Granted, I haven't read every single tweet, but I honestly can't recall this judge ruling in favor of the defense even 1 time (pretty much everything for the prosecution seems to be granted). I honestly don't believe she should be presiding over this case.
When does she come up for re-election?
 
JBS said:
mlbowl said:
...and another defense objection is overruled. :roll: Granted, I haven't read every single tweet, but I honestly can't recall this judge ruling in favor of the defense even 1 time (pretty much everything for the prosecution seems to be granted). I honestly don't believe she should be presiding over this case.
When does she come up for re-election?

I'm not sure.
 
mlbowl said:
JBS said:
mlbowl said:
...and another defense objection is overruled. :roll: Granted, I haven't read every single tweet, but I honestly can't recall this judge ruling in favor of the defense even 1 time (pretty much everything for the prosecution seems to be granted). I honestly don't believe she should be presiding over this case.
When does she come up for re-election?

I'm not sure.

She told me she might not run again. She is able to retire now.
 
In all this talk about prior medical history and family medical history, has Paoli tried to bring it up? Seems strange if he hasn't. Must just be another beat down from the judge.
 
GrizPony said:
mlbowl said:
JBS said:
mlbowl said:
...and another defense objection is overruled. :roll: Granted, I haven't read every single tweet, but I honestly can't recall this judge ruling in favor of the defense even 1 time (pretty much everything for the prosecution seems to be granted). I honestly don't believe she should be presiding over this case.
When does she come up for re-election?

I'm not sure.

She told me she might not run again. She is able to retire now.
Maybe this is just her last horrah then, trying to go out with a judicial fiat.
 
Back
Top