• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

JJ Trial

Come on jury! You're killing me? So, if it's a hung jury, the state has the option of trying the case again correct?
 
Griz2k said:
Come on jury! You're killing me? So, if it's a hung jury, the state has the option of trying the case again correct?
Click to expand...

Twitter is pulling for a hung jury so they can do this all over again.
 
robert d robinson ‏@mslacat
#johnsontrial will always come down to he said she said arguments and no smoking gun of proof. People now a days want definitive proof
Click to expand...
Yeah, and in trials like this they want proof beyond a reasonable doubt. What the hell is wrong with people now a days?
 
Griz2k said:
Sure hope this deliberation doesn't go into the weekend. The longer it takes, the worse for JJ I think.
Click to expand...

That's probably the conventional wisdom, but in reality, it's hard to say. A lot of things could cause the deliberations to take longer than you'd expect. It shouldn't shock anyone if the jury's initial vote is not unanimous, and if it's going to end as a hung jury, then that determination should only be made after the jury has made a diligent attempt to break any deadlock.
 
Bet you money they wanted their free lunch and then once they ate that they need to sit around and make it look good. Happened to me once. We finished the trial and went back to the room to deliberate. Took an initial vote to see what we thought and it was 12 to aquite. BUT we wanted our lunch that we just ordered and we thought they put so much work into the case that we at least needed to give the appearance that we were discussing it. HAHA
 
Forshizzlegrizzle said:
Bet you money they wanted their free lunch and then once they ate that they need to sit around and make it look good. Happened to me once. We finished the trial and went back to the room to deliberate. Took an initial vote to see what we thought and it was 12 to aquite. BUT we wanted our lunch that we just ordered and we thought they put so much work into the case that we at least needed to give the appearance that we were discussing it. HAHA
Click to expand...

Well lets hope thats the case because anybody with a brainstem can see there's nobody guilty of rape in this trial. Except the Missoulian.
 
AZGrizFan said:
Forshizzlegrizzle said:
Bet you money they wanted their free lunch and then once they ate that they need to sit around and make it look good. Happened to me once. We finished the trial and went back to the room to deliberate. Took an initial vote to see what we thought and it was 12 to aquite. BUT we wanted our lunch that we just ordered and we thought they put so much work into the case that we at least needed to give the appearance that we were discussing it. HAHA
Click to expand...

Well lets hope thats the case because anybody with a brainstem can see there's nobody guilty of rape in this trial. Except the Missoulian.
Click to expand...

The only think Jordy rapes is Secondaries
 
FFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

Montana Kaimin ‏@KaiminNews
Official verdict will be announced in less than 30 minutes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top