• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

JJ Trial

funny water said:
EverettGriz said:
I find it fascinating how many younger women on the Twitter feed openly support a not-guilty verdict. I would have expected that to lean much the other direction.

they see through Doe's BS....

Zactly, the ones popping off on twitter prolly know the "victim".
 
I am an "older woman" who does not think Jordan is guilty of anything other than insensitivity. And most - if not all - of my women friends who have the integrity to consider the evidence and the testimony with objectivity and thoughtfulness (and despite any pre-trial conclusions or bias) also agree that this case should never have been brought to trial.

The continued, demonstrated ( :roll: ) bias of this judge takes my breath away.

Please, PLEASE let this be over soon.
 
I have a bad bad feeling about this outcome. This judge is the one making me feel that way! Wow biased much.
 
Cats2506 said:
Fahque said:
wbtfg said:
Solid closing arguments by both sides.
From the Twitter feed, it kind of seemed to me that Paoli's closing was kind of week
sh!tstorm therory... throw enough shit in the air and some will stick to the wall


Sorta like the prosecution's entire case.


Or your posting philosophy. 'Cept, none ever sticks for you...
 
If this travesty results in a conviction Judge Townsend will qualify for the Roland Freisler Award - named for Hitler's puppet judge who railroaded thousands of innocent Germans into prison and worse.
 
missoulian @missoulian

T: We don't talk about rape at lunch. So information isn't shared like it is with other topics. #johnsontrial
Expand
Reply Retweet Favorite Mo

Well, this woman invited someone to lunch to talk about it.
 
Legal minds:

I presume that if JJ is found guilty, there are AMPLE grounds for appeal given the judge's rulings and actions in this case, no?
 
Is the prosecution trying to convince the jury that Jordan Johnson committed a crime or that this isn't a he-said she-said case? Seems more like the latter to me.
 
For the life of me I can't understand why the prosecution keep denying that Doe had anything to do with Pflugrad and O'Day getting fired. Here is the text from the letter her lawyer sent to the Missoulian after Pflugrad made his infamous remark:

Van de Wetering wrote: “Whether or not Mr. Johnson is permitted to play football is not my client’s concern (though the head coach’s comments about Mr. Johnson’s superior character, even after knowing there is an active rape investigation proceeding against him, leaves my client less than confident in the university’s commitment to protect her and respect the court’s no-contact order).”

Clearly she was upset and had her lawyer send a letter to the University, leading to the firing. No one believes she and her family we not involved, why would he even bring it up? If it was my daughter and Pflugrad said that, you better believe I would do everything I could to get rid of him, and own up to it proudly.
 
missoulian @missoulian

T: If she wanted to be conniving, she would have conformed to myth, acted the way people expect and scream, yell and fight. #johnsontrial
Expand
Reply Retweet Favorite Mo

I guess my daughters are just a couple of conformists.
 
JBS said:
missoulian @missoulian

T: If she wanted to be conniving, she would have conformed to myth, acted the way people expect and scream, yell and fight. #johnsontrial
Expand
Reply Retweet Favorite Mo

I guess my daughters are just a couple of conformists.

A conniving conformist!
 
So the woman didn't do what you think she should and did what you think she wouldn't so we wouldn't think it strange she didn't do what we think she should? Thompson logic. Tough to counter that.
 
grizfan95 said:
So the woman didn't do what you think she should and did what you think she wouldn't so we wouldn't think it strange she didn't do what we think she should? Thompson logic. Tough to counter that.
Well stated. You couldn't be more clear.
 
T: She would have had to want them to suffer. #johnsontrial Audible crying from the audience.

Planned by the state? Real? or a florio

no other tweets regarding the crying?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top