'68griz said:
reinell30 said:
At our level it is about the love of the game, not the dollar!
This is a fact. However, it may not be economically successful.
Exactly, and the schools that can compete with Texas and Alabama are the minority in the current NCAA structure. Seriously, how many athletic programs can realistically and feasibly compete at that kind of level? I am guessing less than 50 programs. Those kind of schools need to break away and have upper level FCS and the left over BCS schools at a 2nd level. That is the level I feel the GRIZ and Cats belong. It would also be a huge improvement in level from our current level.
I hate to say it, but I think even athletic programs like WAZZU, Oregon State cannot be consistent contender as is. Fortunately for those programs they have a long bond with the other Pac 12 schools, and the PAC 12 is an elite conference. That is the saving grace for those programs. We need to be tied to the western programs not in the PAC 12. I have a feeling it is a matter of time before the likes of Boise State will come back down to earth too.
Personally, I
would love for the GRIZ and Cats be in a conference with UNLV, Nevada, Boise State, Idaho, Utah State, Colorado State, Air Force, Wyoming, San Jose State, Hawaii, North Dakota State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, BYU (I do think they could financially compete at the highest level though). For me, this is much more appealing for football and basketball than where we are at now.
Would it be possible for the likes of EWU, Cal Davis, and Cal Poly to build their fan bases to consistently draw 15k plus per game within the next 5 to 10 years?
It is sad the money and power of the major universities has gained so much of each. Realistically, I just don't see those things changing to even the playing field some as is. I have a feeling the landscape of college athletics will have some more impactful changes. Hence the main reasons behind Montana choosing to stay put as is when we had to make that decision.