Hurry-Up Offense Will Gas Our O-Line

[LongTimeCatFan]

Did the hurry-up offense gas the O-line?

It might have because they couldn't block for shit

 

[grizindabox]

Did the hurry-up offense gas the O-line?

It might have because they couldn't block for shit

Pretty sure that had nothing to do with being gassed....

 

[LongTimeCatFan]

Did the hurry-up offense gas the O-line?

It might have because they couldn't block for shit

Pretty sure that had nothing to do with being gassed....

[emoji106][emoji6]

 

[AZGrizFan]

Longtimecatfan...so you have watched a game coached by Stitt?

You want to make it sound like the Griz defense will be on the field for 45 minutes per game because they want to be a hurry-up offense, which you want to think means 2 minute drives...

No I haven't, but I don't need to in order to know what's going to happen when a guy thinks he can run, was it 100?, plays per game.

I highly doubt you'll see a 45/15 split on TOP, and if you think that's what I'm saying, you're missing it.

It's the number of plays, not the duration that wears out the defense. By the 4th qtr, it's who's got more stamina and endurance.

If you're gunning for 100 plays on offense, you better have a defense that can play for 100 plays as well.

Every game turns into a shoot out.

You'll see.

Man, you really don't get it. Generally, if one team runs the hurry-up and lots of plays, say 90, and the other team doesn't run a hurry-up, chances are that the team not running the hurry-up will run far fewer plays. Look at Box's post. He laid it out for you.

Bump

CP ran about the same number of plays

Whoever had the ball last won

I'm gonna go out on a very sturdy limb and say that the number of plays had WAY less to do with losing than the four INTs and the fumbles. But you knew that, didn't you?

 

[LongTimeCatFan]

No I haven't, but I don't need to in order to know what's going to happen when a guy thinks he can run, was it 100?, plays per game.

I highly doubt you'll see a 45/15 split on TOP, and if you think that's what I'm saying, you're missing it.

It's the number of plays, not the duration that wears out the defense. By the 4th qtr, it's who's got more stamina and endurance.

If you're gunning for 100 plays on offense, you better have a defense that can play for 100 plays as well.

Every game turns into a shoot out.

You'll see.

Man, you really don't get it. Generally, if one team runs the hurry-up and lots of plays, say 90, and the other team doesn't run a hurry-up, chances are that the team not running the hurry-up will run far fewer plays. Look at Box's post. He laid it out for you.

Bump

CP ran about the same number of plays

Whoever had the ball last won

I'm gonna go out on a very sturdy limb and say that the number of plays had WAY less to do with losing than the four INTs and the fumbles. But you knew that, didn't you?

And yet all of the stupid shit you and box posted in this thread was wrong wasn't it? Do you want to just go ahead and concede that?

 

[AZGrizFan]

I'm gonna go out on a very sturdy limb and say that the number of plays had WAY less to do with losing than the four INTs and the fumbles. But you knew that, didn't you?

And yet all of the stupid shit you and box posted in this thread was wrong wasn't it? Do you want to just go ahead and concede that?

Nope. They (CP) have a similar philosophy, they just do it with running plays instead of passing plays.

 

[AZGrizFan]

The Griz ran 56 plays in the first half. In the 3rd quarter they ran SEVEN. Our offense's inability to function is what gassed our defense, not our quick pace of play. Under ANY form of offense, if it only produces seven plays in 15 minutes, the defense is gonna get gassed.