MNGriz04 said:
By the way MNGriz04, where did you say you coached at?
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
GAME THREAD!!
- Thread starter i do love the griz
- Start date
By the way MNGriz04, where did you say you coached at?
SeaGrizluvr
Well-known member
grizindabox said:
There is a huge difference in a 10 point loss and a 50 POINT LOSS, like still having a fucking chance and playing a competitive game.
CFallsGriz said:
CFalls, pretty sure people explained how that was possible...guess you are good at asking questions but not at reading the helpful answers of some.
SeaGrizluvr said:
So everyone should gauge the success/failure of Montana basketball based on the worst game played by a UM team in probably the past 10-15 years? No one is trying to sugar coat the outcome of the game, but I doubt anyone can remember a Griz team that had as poor a shooting night. As for Cherry, the zone is his biggest nightmare, it took away any chance of him driving to the hoop and he is lucky to hit the backboard most times when he shoots from out.
I feel bad for Will. Anyone who watched him knows he has a ton of fight. Sad to see the seniors go out this way after such a great season. There are no moral vicories in the Dance. Just Ws and L's. I almost think Davidson's loss was more painful. How about Harvard!?
George Ferguson
Well-known member
SMH...
UMGriz75
Well-known member
Syracuse fielded a team unlike anything in the Big Sky. Those were big guys. It isn't so much that Montana couldn't play Syracuse, the fact is that the Big Sky Conference couldn't prepare Montana to play Syracuse.
Too, the ball didn't go in. Can't say Montana didn't shoot, and with good position; one of those games where the ball just didn't go in. They did shut down Cherry and Jamar, but Gregory missed several from "his" range. No real reason, just "didn't go in."
But, what a terrific season, what a terrific team, what a terrific coach. This was a team. Insofar as "sports" is concerned, this team is what it is really all about.
Too, the ball didn't go in. Can't say Montana didn't shoot, and with good position; one of those games where the ball just didn't go in. They did shut down Cherry and Jamar, but Gregory missed several from "his" range. No real reason, just "didn't go in."
But, what a terrific season, what a terrific team, what a terrific coach. This was a team. Insofar as "sports" is concerned, this team is what it is really all about.
Stubby supposedly there might not even be a WAC in a year or so.
Buttegrizzle said:
You used wac and stubby in the same sentence
stubbins
Well-known member
grizindabox said:
i do it all the time....................................use those words in a sentence together...........nothing else.
and that's why I hope that ship hasn't sailed. Ten years ago, even five...the wac was a great conference for the u of m...might have been invited to the MW, or a couple other teams may have stayed. Don't know, but I do know that it makes the u of m's options a lot less visable than they were just a few short years ago.
Neither you nor I will have any impact on elevating Griz athletic fortunes. Look around you...complacency reigns! There is no general desire or hint of leadership for UM to be anything more than what it is: the flag bearer for a half century old halfway house conference for teams in transition. A new generation of Gonzaga's and Boise State's will pass through while the Griz continue treading water waiting for...what? In the meantime, there is little to be satisfied about...
