shawn91111 said:mtgrizrule said:That better be a flagrant on Syracuse.
For what?
Obviously you don't watch games especially this year. Even the biggest homer with any knowledge wouldn't question that.
shawn91111 said:mtgrizrule said:That better be a flagrant on Syracuse.
For what?
grizd said:Time to play some big time out of conference games so we don't shit our pants every time we play a name school.
Montana is making Syracuse look unbeatable...they are good, to be sure, but UM is simply not there...tentative, passing on good shots and taking poor onesagain, perimeter passing..might as well just give it to SU<Grizfan-24 said:grizchamp said:Different team different matchup. Can't make the comparison.bGrizzled said:Davidson took it to 1 point on a four seed... For Crise sakes!
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
I can't agree more. Doesn't have to be about the seed but rather the matchup.
We needed to shoot the ball well, and there just aren't many chances.
Can't throw it the ocean.
Jesus we look like a high school team. That is how syracuse makes people look when they are playing well.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :clap: :clap: :clap:wbtfg said:UM should fire Tinkle so we can hire him in bozeman.
grizd said:shawn91111 said:mtgrizrule said:That better be a flagrant on Syracuse.
For what?
Obviously you don't watch games especially this year. Even the biggest homer with any knowledge wouldn't question that.
Harvard is not physically outmatched by New Mexico at all, apples and oranges.billings_poke said:You simply don't have the athletes to compete at the 3, 4 and 5 spot with Syracuse. Add in not really facing this kind of team at all this year and that is not a good recipe for a win.
Need a princeton type offense when you are outmanned this bad to be competitive. Kind of like Harvard is doing to New Mexico. Slow paced, shoot after long possessions, etc