BDizzle said:
So is this a good thing or a bad thing. Sounds like Cherry and others think their sh#t don't stink. Hopefully he won't bring that attitude to Missoula.
BDizzle, I do not know this coach, but do know this a very old school tactic. I learned this from one of HS coaches as well as Adam Morrison's dad, John, when he coached at Dawson Community College. The point is when the chemistry and/or attitude is not right or waying in the slightest within any rotation to make the point to that whole unit. If it is only one player, then you prove that point to that one player. I have seen coaches do this at HS and college level. It is risky, and a coach has to be selective when to do it.
I did it 2x's one time at the 8th grade AAU level boys ball. The other JV girls basketball. Not so much because the attitudes were bad or the play was extremely bad, but because we (the boys team) had been working constantly on execution of help defense and trapping responsibilities. Against my better judgement, I decided to try it in a game we had in hand. I wanted to get an idea where we were at against competition. Collectively, it just did not hit home to that unit. I pulled them all for a quarter. The other team made it's run. Fortunately we still won. God knows I heared it from certain parents. Yet was complemented by parents that wanted more PT for their kid.
After the game, I did not explain myself but told the team to think about the game over the next few days and next practice have them tell me why I did what I did? 2 days later we had our next practice, collectively they told me, "Coach, we were not doing things right even after all the practice so you pulled us." I responded with, "So what is the solution to this problem?" They knew all they had to do was learn and execute from now on. Not one time did we ever have that problem or any problem in executing anything collectively again.
To me, my players were not bad kids or bad attitudes, but that was the only option I had in hopes to make a statement. It worked! (both times)!!!! Was it a major thing in the grand scheme of life or basketball? No. However as a coach, it was major to me and I knew it was something that was holding the team back from improving. To this day, of the 11 players I had on that 8th grade team, 8 are playing varsity as sophomores with 5 different programs, 3 are still looking for the chance. Their coaches comment how mature they are for young kids. The parents tell their HS coaches they learned early in AAU ball.
From a standpoint of a basketball and coach, if anything that coach did their future college coaches a favor. I think nothing of it. I am sure Cherry is not only a quality player, but a quality person. Also, his coach is working with him in transitioning from SG to being a college ready PG. He sped up Cherry's transition time there.

Not only will this action impact those 5, but will impact every class from now on. After all, did the article not say he is a 1st year coach? I doubt this coach will ever have to worry about this again at this program. Good job, Coach!