• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

FCS STATS Poll (Oct 30)

IdaGriz01

IdaGriz01

Well-known member
Rank, School (Record), Votes {First Place}, [Prev]
1 James Madison (8-0) 4044 {156} [1]
2 North Dakota State (8-0) 3894 {6} [2]
3 Jacksonville State (7-1) 3682 [3]
4 Central Arkansas (7-1) 3572 [4]
5 Sam Houston State (7-1) 3360 [5]
6 South Dakota (7-1) 3107 [6]
7 Elon (7-1) 2840 [10]
8 Wofford (7-1) 2817 [8]
9 North Carolina A&T (8-0) 2788 [7]
10 South Dakota State (6-2) 2721 [11]
11 Eastern Washington (5-3) 2118 [14]
12 Illinois State (6-2) 2098 [16]
13 Grambling State (7-1) 1771 [15]
14 Stony Brook (6-2) 1592 [22]
15 Western Illinois (5-3) 1539 [12]
16 Samford (5-3) 1441 [9]
17 Southern Utah (6-2) 1246 [25]
18 Northern Arizona (6-2) 1134 [NR]
19 Weber State (6-2) 1072 [NR]
20 Villanova (4-4) 989 [13]
21 New Hampshire (5-3) 964 [17]
22 McNeese (6-2) 571 [20]
23 Furman (6-3) 565 [NR]
24 Western Carolina (6-3) 551 [18]
25 Kennesaw State (7-1) 391 [NR]

Others: Nicholls (388) , Richmond (363) , Monmouth (245) , Delaware (182) , UNI (177) , Youngstown State (95) , Montana (88) , Duquesne (73) , Yale (40) , Citadel (36) , North Carolina Central (26) , Columbia (20) , Austin Peay (17) , Maine (9) , Charleston Southern (9) , Dartmouth (6) , Princeton (5) , Montana State (2) , Howard (1) , Hampton (1)
 
Have not looked much at the details yet, but the pollster did move both Weber and NAU into the top-25. What's interesting is that they dropped Richmond (4-4), but not Villanove (4-4). That's the advantage of starting the weekend at #13 ... you drop seven spots but survive in the top-25.
 
Fahque said:
EWU shouldn’t be #11 at 5-3 IMO
Click to expand...
No argument from here. That 5-3 record sure does look odd in among all those other 6-2 and 7-1 teams. But EWU was one of the poll guesses that I hit on the nose -- based on my "formulas" for how the pollsters behave. One thing that's clear is that most of them just take old list, look at who won or lost and then adjust their new list according to that. Not many, if any, actually look at the whole record and who a team beat or lost to. Sad, but that seems to be how it works.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top