• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

FCS STATS Poll Guesses (Oct 15)

IdaGriz01

Well-known member
Every week brings a new set of problems in trying to guess what the pollsters will do, and this week is no exception. Down at the bottom, where four ranked teams lost, the choices should be relatively straightforward. But what about those two losses in the top-10? How far will the losers drop … and will the pollsters move the Griz up after their solid road win?

Since STATS.com runs the poll, what Craig Haley says has to be a factor. In his review of yesterday’s results, he made two very interesting observations. First, he called the NDSU loss a “beatdown” (which it was). That’s not a good omen for them. He also pointed out something I hadn’t noticed. There are seven FCS teams that have won two games against STATS-ranked opponents, one of which are the Griz. But here’s the deal: Montana is the only team on that list that had its two ranked-team wins on the road.

Poll Guess, Team (Record), Current Rank
#1 SDSU (6-0) [1]
#2 Montana State (5-1) [2]
#3 Sacramento State (5-1) [4]
#4 Furman (5-1) [5]
#5 Idaho (5-2) [3]
#6 Incarnate Word (5-1) [7]
#7 Delaware (5-1) [8]
#8 Western Carolina (5-1) [9]
#9 South Dakota (5-1) [10]
#10 North Dakota (4-2) [15]
#11 NDSU (4-2) [6]
#12 Montana (6-1) [16]
#13 William & Mary (4-2) [11]
#14 Holy Cross (4-2) [12]
#15 Southern Illinois (5-1) [13]
#16 NC Central (5-1) [14]
#17 UT Martin (5-1) [17]
#18 Florida A&M (5-1) [18]
#19 Harvard (5-0) [19]
#20 Central Arkansas (5-2) [20]
#21 Villanova (5-2) NR
#22 Chattanooga (5-2) [25]
#23 UC Davis (4-3) NR
#24 New Hampshire (3-3) NR
#25 YSU (3-3) [23]

NR Weber State (3-4) [22]
NR Eastern Washington (2-4) [21]
NR Albany (4-3) [24]

I’m about to bend some of my rules of thumb, but my Idaho placement is not one of them. The Vandals lost by just two points to what I think the pollsters will see as a strong ranked opponent. They might drop one more spot, but not much more than that. (More on the Griz in a moment.)

That, of course, brings us to North Dakota State. They too lost to a strong ranked team and would not normally drop a lot. But when the result was a “beatdown,” I’m guessing the pollsters will decide that the loser should not be in the top-10. Could be wrong, and I could also see them dropping even further. Still, I don’t think that will happen since the Bison’s two losses were to ranked teams.

Now here’s where I really bend my rules. As a general thing, teams don’t move up a lot unless there are easy gaps to move into … which we really don’t have. However, because of the beatdown, I’m thinking the pollsters might jump North Dakota to just ahead of NDSU. That’s five spots, which would be quite unusual … but I think not in this case.

So then I bent my rules once more and moved the Griz up four to #12. Again, that would be quite unusual. I think it could happened because (1) the Griz beat the #3 team on the road (for a second road win against a ranked opponent), and (2) that nice 6-1 record starts to look pretty impressive when it includes those two great wins.

The rest of the list is fairly routine. Weber and EWU were not highly ranked, lost to unranked opponents, and now have losing records. Albany was barely into the top-25, and also lost to an unranked opponent. So they’re all gone. It happens that many of the top “Others Receiving Votes” teams also lost. Thus, I had to dig a bit deeper to find likely “replacements.” That being said, one was easy: I think the pollsters will stick UC Davis in where Weber dropped out. Also, since New Hampshire knocked off Albany, they’ll get that spot. Lastly, Villanova was the highest previous vote-getter that won, so I moved them into the block of (5-2) teams.

I am a bit uneasy about Youngstown State, even though they lost by only a FG on the road to a top-10 opponent. With them sitting at #23, they may not get enough votes from the pollsters to hang on in the top-25. If they drop out, my replacement would be Austin Peay, which had a very impressive win (and Haley had nice things to say about them.)
 
I noticed that Hero sports moved us up all the way to 6th on his ballot. (Sam Herder) and Craig Haley moved us up to 8th on his ballot. Not saying we will be in the top 10, but that is a considerable Jump from these two Poll voters.
Here is Sam Herders notes on the Griz:
“Montana skyrocketed to No. 6. I was critical of Montana’s September performances and dropped the Grizzlies out of my ballot for a couple of weeks. Teams like Weber and W&M also got similar treatments with big drops due to performances. I wasn’t the only one to unrank Montana, and some Griz followers were also talking about doomsday scenarios. But a weekly reminder that I vote each week based on the performances and results at that point in the season, not slotting things based on my previous ballots and not projecting ahead.

Two things can be true: Montana wasn’t playing like a Top 25 team in September, but the Griz are playing like a Top 10 team now.

Any judgment of how Montana looked last month can be thrown away. This is a different-looking squad that has beaten two straight ranked opponents on the road. I moved them to No. 19 last week after beating UC Davis. Then Saturday saw a win at No. 3 Idaho. The Griz are now getting the defensive pressure they lacked in September, the o-line is playing with more of an edge, and Clifton McDowell has steadied the QB spot and then some by taking the reins as the starter and playing better every week.

At 6-1 overall and back-to-back ranked wins on the road, Montana no doubt deserves to be in the Top 10.”
 
GottaluvGriz said:
I noticed that Hero sports moved us up all the way to 6th on his ballot. (Sam Herder) and Craig Hailey moved us up to 8th on his ballot. Not saying we will be in the top 10, but that is a considerable Jump from these two Poll voters.
Here is Sam Herders notes on the Griz:
“Montana skyrocketed to No. 6. I was critical of Montana’s September performances and dropped the Grizzlies out of my ballot for a couple of weeks. Teams like Weber and W&M also got similar treatments with big drops due to performances. I wasn’t the only one to unrank Montana, and some Griz followers were also talking about doomsday scenarios. But a weekly reminder that I vote each week based on the performances and results at that point in the season, not slotting things based on my previous ballots and not projecting ahead.

Two things can be true: Montana wasn’t playing like a Top 25 team in September, but the Griz are playing like a Top 10 team now.

Any judgment of how Montana looked last month can be thrown away. This is a different-looking squad that has beaten two straight ranked opponents on the road. I moved them to No. 19 last week after beating UC Davis. Then Saturday saw a win at No. 3 Idaho. The Griz are now getting the defensive pressure they lacked in September, the o-line is playing with more of an edge, and Clifton McDowell has steadied the QB spot and then some by taking the reins as the starter and playing better every week.

At 6-1 overall and back-to-back ranked wins on the road, Montana no doubt deserves to be in the Top 10.”
Wow! My "going out on a limb" to bend my normal rules is looking better and better. However, many pollsters don't seem to get that deep in preparing their ballots. I'm liking my guess more, but I do not see the overall votes moving the Griz into the top-10. (Would love to be wrong, of course.)
 
IdaGriz01 said:
GottaluvGriz said:
I noticed that Hero sports moved us up all the way to 6th on his ballot. (Sam Herder) and Craig Hailey moved us up to 8th on his ballot. Not saying we will be in the top 10, but that is a considerable Jump from these two Poll voters.
Here is Sam Herders notes on the Griz:
“Montana skyrocketed to No. 6. I was critical of Montana’s September performances and dropped the Grizzlies out of my ballot for a couple of weeks. Teams like Weber and W&M also got similar treatments with big drops due to performances. I wasn’t the only one to unrank Montana, and some Griz followers were also talking about doomsday scenarios. But a weekly reminder that I vote each week based on the performances and results at that point in the season, not slotting things based on my previous ballots and not projecting ahead.

Two things can be true: Montana wasn’t playing like a Top 25 team in September, but the Griz are playing like a Top 10 team now.

Any judgment of how Montana looked last month can be thrown away. This is a different-looking squad that has beaten two straight ranked opponents on the road. I moved them to No. 19 last week after beating UC Davis. Then Saturday saw a win at No. 3 Idaho. The Griz are now getting the defensive pressure they lacked in September, the o-line is playing with more of an edge, and Clifton McDowell has steadied the QB spot and then some by taking the reins as the starter and playing better every week.

At 6-1 overall and back-to-back ranked wins on the road, Montana no doubt deserves to be in the Top 10.”
Wow! My "going out on a limb" to bend my normal rules is looking better and better. However, many pollsters don't seem to get that deep in preparing their ballots. I'm liking my guess more, but I do not see the overall votes moving the Griz into the top-10. (Would love to be wrong, of course.)

Herder must be taking his meds again.
 
Probably a good bye week coming up for the Griz. We will get a bit more top 10 movement after next week’s games.
MSU at Sac State
Furman at West Carolina
SDSU at Southern Illinois
 
Its a good thing Harvard wont be in the playoffs... I watched their last 2 games. and they are really good
 
GottaluvGriz said:
I noticed that Hero sports moved us up all the way to 6th on his ballot. (Sam Herder) and Craig Hailey moved us up to 8th on his ballot. Not saying we will be in the top 10, but that is a considerable Jump from these two Poll voters.
Here is Sam Herders notes on the Griz:
“Montana skyrocketed to No. 6. I was critical of Montana’s September performances and dropped the Grizzlies out of my ballot for a couple of weeks. Teams like Weber and W&M also got similar treatments with big drops due to performances. I wasn’t the only one to unrank Montana, and some Griz followers were also talking about doomsday scenarios. But a weekly reminder that I vote each week based on the performances and results at that point in the season, not slotting things based on my previous ballots and not projecting ahead.

Two things can be true: Montana wasn’t playing like a Top 25 team in September, but the Griz are playing like a Top 10 team now.

Any judgment of how Montana looked last month can be thrown away. This is a different-looking squad that has beaten two straight ranked opponents on the road. I moved them to No. 19 last week after beating UC Davis. Then Saturday saw a win at No. 3 Idaho. The Griz are now getting the defensive pressure they lacked in September, the o-line is playing with more of an edge, and Clifton McDowell has steadied the QB spot and then some by taking the reins as the starter and playing better every week.

At 6-1 overall and back-to-back ranked wins on the road, Montana no doubt deserves to be in the Top 10.”

I think his explanation is completely acceptable and logical.
 
Paytonlives said:
Its a good thing Harvard wont be in the playoffs... I watched their last 2 games. and they are really good
Totally agree. Their dual-threat QB is the real deal. Wonder if someone could lure him through the portal with some big NIL money?
 
Ferris state win value took a hit. Yesterday the lost to Grand Valley State #4 by a score of 49-28
 
IdaGriz01 said:
Every week brings a new set of problems in trying to guess what the pollsters will do, and this week is no exception. Down at the bottom, where four ranked teams lost, the choices should be relatively straightforward. But what about those two losses in the top-10? How far will the losers drop … and will the pollsters move the Griz up after their solid road win?

Since STATS.com runs the poll, what Craig Haley says has to be a factor. In his review of yesterday’s results, he made two very interesting observations. First, he called the NDSU loss a “beatdown” (which it was). That’s not a good omen for them. He also pointed out something I hadn’t noticed. There are seven FCS teams that have won two games against STATS-ranked opponents, one of which are the Griz. But here’s the deal: Montana is the only team on that list that had its two ranked-team wins on the road.

Poll Guess, Team (Record), Current Rank
#1 SDSU (6-0) [1]
#2 Montana State (5-1) [2]
#3 Sacramento State (5-1) [4]
#4 Furman (5-1) [5]
#5 Idaho (5-2) [3]
#6 Incarnate Word (5-1) [7]
#7 Delaware (5-1) [8]
#8 Western Carolina (5-1) [9]
#9 South Dakota (5-1) [10]
#10 North Dakota (4-2) [15]
#11 NDSU (4-2) [6]
#12 Montana (6-1) [16]
#13 William & Mary (4-2) [11]
#14 Holy Cross (4-2) [12]
#15 Southern Illinois (5-1) [13]
#16 NC Central (5-1) [14]
#17 UT Martin (5-1) [17]
#18 Florida A&M (5-1) [18]
#19 Harvard (5-0) [19]
#20 Central Arkansas (5-2) [20]
#21 Villanova (5-2) NR
#22 Chattanooga (5-2) [25]
#23 UC Davis (4-3) NR
#24 New Hampshire (3-3) NR
#25 YSU (3-3) [23]

NR Weber State (3-4) [22]
NR Eastern Washington (2-4) [21]
NR Albany (4-3) [24]

I’m about to bend some of my rules of thumb, but my Idaho placement is not one of them. The Vandals lost by just two points to what I think the pollsters will see as a strong ranked opponent. They might drop one more spot, but not much more than that. (More on the Griz in a moment.)

That, of course, brings us to North Dakota State. They too lost to a strong ranked team and would not normally drop a lot. But when the result was a “beatdown,” I’m guessing the pollsters will decide that the loser should not be in the top-10. Could be wrong, and I could also see them dropping even further. Still, I don’t think that will happen since the Bison’s two losses were to ranked teams.

Now here’s where I really bend my rules. As a general thing, teams don’t move up a lot unless there are easy gaps to move into … which we really don’t have. However, because of the beatdown, I’m thinking the pollsters might jump North Dakota to just ahead of NDSU. That’s five spots, which would be quite unusual … but I think not in this case.

So then I bent my rules once more and moved the Griz up four to #12. Again, that would be quite unusual. I think it could happened because (1) the Griz beat the #3 team on the road (for a second road win against a ranked opponent), and (2) that nice 6-1 record starts to look pretty impressive when it includes those two great wins.

The rest of the list is fairly routine. Weber and EWU were not highly ranked, lost to unranked opponents, and now have losing records. Albany was barely into the top-25, and also lost to an unranked opponent. So they’re all gone. It happens that many of the top “Others Receiving Votes” teams also lost. Thus, I had to dig a bit deeper to find likely “replacements.” That being said, one was easy: I think the pollsters will stick UC Davis in where Weber dropped out. Also, since New Hampshire knocked off Albany, they’ll get that spot. Lastly, Villanova was the highest previous vote-getter that won, so I moved them into the block of (5-2) teams.

I am a bit uneasy about Youngstown State, even though they lost by only a FG on the road to a top-10 opponent. With them sitting at #23, they may not get enough votes from the pollsters to hang on in the top-25. If they drop out, my replacement would be Austin Peay, which had a very impressive win (and Haley had nice things to say about them.)
Looks like we moved up to #9

https://theanalyst.com/na/2023/10/with-five-straight-wins-uiw-climbs-to-season-high-no-5-in-fcs-top-25-poll/
 
Ursus1 said:
Ferris state win value took a hit. Yesterday the lost to Grand Valley State #4 by a score of 49-28

GVSU was Ferris State before Ferris State. They are the 1/2 combo in D-II and have been for years. And their rivalry goes back a ways...that's not necessarily a bad (or unexpected) loss...
 
Back
Top