• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Fcs recruiting rankings

ilovethecats said:
I see what you are saying. My issue is many times these rankings are not even in the correct stratosphere. And I really mean that. Over the years there was so many head-scratching comments, critiques, rankings, etc. I lost count and had to stop even reading. It was asinine.

If it's going to be SO terrible, and SO out of the realm of reality, I'm fine with the FCS never having a ranking. It'd be no different than me ranking players in class C girls volleyball in Missouri. They wouldn't be close to anything accurate, but at least the girls would be ranked!

Bingo.
 
ilovethecats said:
CatzWillRise said:
CDAGRIZ said:
CatzWillRise said:
I'm sure Brian and Sam would love feedback on how to rank all 120+ FCS schools recruiting classes between the two of them. No other outlet even attempts this at the FCS level.

In assessing players, step #1 might be to watch tape of the players playing. If you can't do that, perhaps you don't pretend to assess the players.

Well then FCS will never have a class ranking then. I'd rather have some discussion fodder than nothing, but that's just me. I appreciate that an outlet cares enough to even put one together for FCS football.
I see what you are saying. My issue is many times these rankings are not even in the correct stratosphere. And I really mean that. Over the years there was so many head-scratching comments, critiques, rankings, etc. I lost count and had to stop even reading. It was asinine.

If it's going to be SO terrible, and SO out of the realm of reality, I'm fine with the FCS never having a ranking. It'd be no different than me ranking players in class C girls volleyball in Missouri. They wouldn't be close to anything accurate, but at least the girls would be ranked!

As usual, no love for my 2006 College Bowling Recruiting Rankings, but go ahead and clickfarm for your Missouri Class C VB Rankings. Class C? More like ClassLESS!
 
CDAGRIZ said:
ilovethecats said:
CatzWillRise said:
CDAGRIZ said:
In assessing players, step #1 might be to watch tape of the players playing. If you can't do that, perhaps you don't pretend to assess the players.

Well then FCS will never have a class ranking then. I'd rather have some discussion fodder than nothing, but that's just me. I appreciate that an outlet cares enough to even put one together for FCS football.
I see what you are saying. My issue is many times these rankings are not even in the correct stratosphere. And I really mean that. Over the years there was so many head-scratching comments, critiques, rankings, etc. I lost count and had to stop even reading. It was asinine.

If it's going to be SO terrible, and SO out of the realm of reality, I'm fine with the FCS never having a ranking. It'd be no different than me ranking players in class C girls volleyball in Missouri. They wouldn't be close to anything accurate, but at least the girls would be ranked!

As usual, no love for my 2006 College Bowling Recruiting Rankings, but go ahead and clickfarm for your Missouri Class C VB Rankings. Class C? More like ClassLESS!
:lol:
Quality stuff.
 
CatzWillRise said:
I'm sure Brian and Sam would love feedback on how to rank all 120+ FCS schools recruiting classes between the two of them. No other outlet even attempts this at the FCS level.

They realize it would not be worth the space it takes up.
 
Back
Top