EWU Nevada game

[dub-foncy]

The study numbers are wrong according to our AD. I provided a source in the link.

You aren't providing anything beyond a sour attitude.

Yet you continue to post that I'm wrong and you were right...

You might want to bow out here until you can provide some evidence to back up your claims.

I provided evidence of two years ago. You are being a stubborn ass. I listened to Greg Sundberg two days ago on this very topic and yes the budget is currently around $13 million (and yes I consider $15.2 million to be around $13).

You consider 13 million to be the same as 15.2? You say I'm being the stubborn ass? An extra 2.2 million dollars would get us a million dollar a year basketball coach AND a million dollar football coach, and we would still have enough money left over to pay our assistants $20 grand a year more EACH. You consider that to be the same thing as our current budget? Step away from the keyboard before you say something even stupider.

The numbers in the NAU study were blatantly wrong. Our athletic department would have been gutted if we had to cut 2.2 million dollars from it. That's a 15% decrease.

You were annihilated in this argument 3 posts ago and yet you keep coming back for more posting something dumber each time.

 

[MT Jack]

dub-foncy -

I can accept you berating my alma mater's football team/program. I can accept you looking down your nose at anything "football-related" that is outside of your Washington-Grizzly Stadium mecca.

But I draw the line at you talking smack about the legitimacy of the Mellenbrook Policy Advisors study. Them's fighting words.

On a positive note, today's game should give people something to complain about other than Bobby Hauck, the inferiority of conference opponents, Jimmy Wilson's social exploits or the Kaiman.