Everyone is equal

[Rjones61]

we should beat EWU, does the home game go to the highest bidder since there isn't a seed left?

Oh, you should? Interesting... :roll:

Sorry to confuse you by not using your native language. The quote you cite cuts off the predicate. Here is the entire sentence: I think UNI could beat Illinois State. If they do, and we should beat EWU, , ,

In other words, there are two conditionals present: 1, that UNI has to beat Ill St. and; 2 that if we should beat EWU , , ,

Don't get your feathers in a bunch. I am not necessarily making the prediction that we will. I am however very happy that the reins have been released from the offense. If we do go back in two weeks, you just might be surprised at the difference.

As other have already point out, in order to complete this conditional, you have to say "should we" and not "we should". Looks like someone else needs to go back and learn some English.

 

[GrizPony]

Thanks for "point" [ing] that out! haha

 

[GrizPony]

we should beat EWU, does the home game go to the highest bidder since there isn't a seed left?

Oh, you should? Interesting... :roll:

Sorry to confuse you by not using your native language. The quote you cite cuts off the predicate. Here is the entire sentence: I think UNI could beat Illinois State. If they do, and we should beat EWU, , ,

In other words, there are two conditionals present: 1, that UNI has to beat Ill St. and; 2 that if we should beat EWU , , ,

Don't get your feathers in a bunch. I am not necessarily making the prediction that we will. I am however very happy that the reins have been released from the offense. If we do go back in two weeks, you just might be surprised at the difference.

As other have already [screwed up with my lack of English skills], in order to complete this conditional, you have to say "should we" and not "we should". Looks like someone else needs to go back and learn some English.

Fixed that for you.

 

[Rjones61]

Oh, you should? Interesting... :roll:

Sorry to confuse you by not using your native language. The quote you cite cuts off the predicate. Here is the entire sentence: I think UNI could beat Illinois State. If they do, and we should beat EWU, , ,

In other words, there are two conditionals present: 1, that UNI has to beat Ill St. and; 2 that if we should beat EWU , , ,

Don't get your feathers in a bunch. I am not necessarily making the prediction that we will. I am however very happy that the reins have been released from the offense. If we do go back in two weeks, you just might be surprised at the difference.

As other have already [screwed up with my lack of English skills], in order to complete this conditional, you have to say "should we" and not "we should". Looks like someone else needs to go back and learn some English.

Fixed that for you.

What are you even talking about? I didn't mess anything up. I interpreted the sentence exactly how it was written.

 

[RobGriz]

we should beat EWU, does the home game go to the highest bidder since there isn't a seed left?

Oh, you should? Interesting... :roll:

What's interesting is the inordinate amount of time some ewu fans spend on this board.

 

[GrizPony]

Jesus that is sad if you think that statement is true. Your statement should have read: "As other have already point[ed] out, ....." If you correct someone's grammar you should use it properly yourself.

 

[marceagfan5]

we should beat EWU, does the home game go to the highest bidder since there isn't a seed left?

Oh, you should? Interesting... :roll:

I am guaranteeing a Griz win over San Diego, and guaranteeing a win over EWU.

This isn't the same no-fire Griz team of a few weeks ago. The past two weeks they have picked up the intensity. It's what Montana does; it's the winningest FCS football team since 2000 :!:

Wow, pretty bold prediction there. You do realize EWU will be healthy this time when you play them right? Adams won't be coming off 4 weeks of no practice with a broken foot and Forte won't get 8 carries....Baldwin will get 2 weeks to prepare for the Griz because you aren't going to lose to USD.

You guys played a great game on Saturday, but you beat a MSU team at home without their starting running back and quarterback and suddenly the Griz have turned the corner, weren't you just complaining about the SUU game the week before...

Good luck on Saturday, you guys don't need it as it will be a blowout though...

 

[56n92]

No question the Eagles are concerned about the griz coming to Cheney again. Just like the griz are concerned that they will be coming to Cheney. It's pretty awesome that the same rivalry game gets to happen two times in the same season. Any Eagle fan that says they aren't concerned is lying. Any griz fan guaranteeing a win in Cheney should back that up with some kind of significant commitment to see just how much their guarantee really means.

 

[kemajic]

Now that we know the playoff path of all the teams, especially ours, how far does everyone see UM getting?

Here is the bracket :arrow:

http://i.turner.ncaa.com/dr/ncaa/ncaa7/release/sites/default/files/external/gametool/brackets/football_fcs_2014.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The selection committee didn't do the Griz, or the Cats for that matter, any favors. Beating
Eastern or NDSU on the road will be very tough.

The Griz could not have had an easier first round draw with a chance for a rematch with EWU, who we are capable of beating. What's not like about that?

 

[Rjones61]

Jesus that is sad if you think that statement is true. Your statement should have read: "As other have already point[ed] out, ....." If you correct someone's grammar you should use it properly yourself.

I wasn't just correcting grammar, the dude chewed me out for not interpreting the sentence how he wanted me to. I know you want to come in and white knight your fellow Griz fan, but he clearly mixed up words that completely changed his statement.

 

[GrizPony]

His syntax was off, your grammar was lacking. No white night here, as that phrase is racist.

 

[Rjones61]

His syntax was off, your grammar was lacking. No white night here, as that phrase is racist.

:thumb:

 

[Grizzlies1982]

His syntax was off, your grammar was lacking. No white night here, as that phrase is racist.

Hate to step into this mess, but shouldn't that be "knight"? :ugeek:

 

[GrizPony]

BOOM! I must have been dreaming of a white Christmas.