I don't know much, except here's a summary of the persistent rumors. The panel, composed of 4 students and 3 faculty/administrators, voted against JJ several weeks ago, supposedly on a 5-2 vote. This was just another step in the process, and is not the end of the process. Note that this was applying the recently lowered, and presumably illegal, standard. Illegal in the sense that it was changed and applied after-the-fact. The board also reported that the panel refused to review the texts from the accuser that were favorable to JJ. Someone higher up, perhaps Christian, has told Enstrom not to uphold the decision, at least not yet. This is probably why the curious press release was put out by the university system. If JJ were expelled, prior to a charge by the county attorneys office, there would be a s-storm and major league criticism. There could also be a lawsuit. Some believe a case based on the fact the U changed its legal and other standards after-the-fact, combined with other process problems, would go in JJ's favor. Some also think JJ would have a potential major league lawsuit for damages. Some think the county attorneys office has not charged him, because they realize they don't have the normal facts for charging and wouldn't win the case. However, the office has the feds breathing down their necks and focusing on this incident. Some think this could make claim for damages even better, and bigger.
JJ's attorney is top notch. He's gotten at least one major victory with damages against the city.
If JJ gets through this, he will be a great qb for the Griz. He will be mentally tougher than any qb UM has ever had. I'm rooting for JJ. Due process is very important. I want him to get through this for himself, not for UM football.