Engstrom declines to challenge his mistake

[argh!]

wrong about what? that none of us knows for sure what happened between johnson and that girl? i haven't seen any videos or confessions from the her saying what happened was correctly described by the little fantasies you penned on egriz. keep trying, adjunct, keep trying.

The jury saw everything both sides had to offer and found JJ innocent in record time. You were wrong then and wrong now. You are the one that made shit up. We DO know what happened, and it was NOT rape. That was decided by an unbiased jury that heard everything both sides had to say. Even the public was ordered out for some testimony so the only people that heard it all concluded that no rape occurred. "But Aaaaaaaaargh I'm a stupid pirate and me thinks me knows all!"

made shit up? pshaw. i don't know what happened, neither do you. the jury decided if there was enough evidence to find him guilty. obviously, there wasn't. you really fit your 'old' name well.

No, the jury found him Not Guilty.

gawd, you are such a third grader greenie.

 

[argh!]

How does someone "challenge his mistake," anyway?

what leads you to expect coherence on egriz?

 

[Ursa Major]

How does someone "challenge his mistake," anyway?

I believe it includes both smoke and mirrors. But I could be wrong.

 

[GrizPony]

How does someone "challenge his mistake," anyway?

what leads you to expect coherence on egriz?

People make mistakes and then realize later they were wrong. Then they can try to challenge that mistake and set it aside. What isn't coherent about that?

 

[CDAGRIZ]

How does someone "challenge his mistake," anyway?

what leads you to expect coherence on egriz?

People make mistakes and then realize later they were wrong. Then they can try to challenge that mistake and set it aside. What isn't coherent about that?

Is it kind of like multiplying two negative numbers? I once hit a golf ball through a windshield by mistake, but I later challenged that shit and it was like I never hit the shot. In fact, I found the ball in the bottom of the hole, but my pants were off.

 

[EverettGriz]

How does someone "challenge his mistake," anyway?

what leads you to expect coherence on egriz?

People make mistakes and then realize later they were wrong. Then they can try to challenge that mistake and set it aside. What isn't coherent about that?

Is it kind of like multiplying two negative numbers? I once hit a golf ball through a windshield by mistake, but I later challenged that shit and it was like I never hit the shot. In fact, I found the ball in the bottom of the hole, but my pants were off.

:lol:

 

[UMGriz75]

Is it kind of like multiplying two negative numbers? I once hit a golf ball through a windshield by mistake, but I later challenged that shit and it was like I never hit the shot. In fact, I found the ball in the bottom of the hole, but my pants were off.

That's a helluva way to become President of the University.