• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Early Stats

PlayerRep

Well-known member
For Big Sky teams with 2 games, which excludes Ida St:

UM is:
3d in scoring offense
2d in scoring defense
better than MSU in rushing offense
1st in rushing defense
6st in pass offense
5th in pass defense
7th in passing efficiency
1st in passing efficiency defense
1st in KO returns
5th in punt returns
1st in interceptions
6th in punting
3d in KO coverage
tied for 1st in FG's and percentage
1st in sacks


Individual:

Sneed is 9th in rushing
JLM is 1st in receptions per game
Sneed is pretty good in completion percentage and okay in efficiency
Sneed is ahead of Gabrud in completion percentage by a bit, but way behind him in efficiency
Sneed is 4th in TO
JLM is 2d in punt return average
Flowers is 1st in KO return average
Willams 6th in punting
Semenza tied for first in FG's
Olson 1st in tackles and sacks and 2d in TFL
Nash and Calhoun 3d and 7th in passes defended

Griz up there in some national categories too.
 
"We gotta quit doing dumb stuff!" ~ Bobby


Montana Grizzlies start season near top of FCS in most penalties, penalty yards

AMIE JUST 406mtsports.com
Sep 9, 2018 Updated 1 min ago


MISSOULA — Through two games, Montana has racked up 19 penalties and 175 penalty yards. The Grizzlies were flagged 10 times for 88 yards against Drake and nine times for 87 yards against Northern Iowa.

Montana coach Bobby Hauck didn't mince words about penalties on Saturday.

"I'd just call it being dumb," Hauck said. "... I didn't have any sense that we didn't have focus. We gotta quit doing dumb stuff."

He added later of the sloppiness: "I attribute it to us being dumb. Starting with the head coach, we gotta get it right."

Montana's 19 flags through two games rank 102nd out of the 116 teams in the FCS. And the yards associated with those penalties rank 104th out of 116.

Teams with more penalties through this far in the season: Morgan State, N.C. Central, Southeastern Louisiana, Morehead State, McNeese, Arkansas Pine Bluff, Stony Brook, Prairie View A&M and North Carolina A&T. And the last two teams in that list have played in three games, not two.

Against Drake, Montana was flagged once for pass interference (Robby Hauck), four times for false starts (Keenan Curran, Randy Rodriguez, Angel Villanueva and team) twice for holds (Kobey Eaton, Adam Eastwood), once for roughing the passer (Josh Buss), once for a late hit (Conlan Beaver) and once for a delay of game.

There were also two declined offside penalties.

Against Northern Iowa, Montana was called for a host of different penalties: four pass interference calls (Dareon Nash, Justin Calhoun, Lewis Cowans, Reid Miller), a late hit flag (Robby Hauck), one offside penalty, two holding penalties (Samuel Akem, Samori Toure) and one false start (Beaver).

Coach Hauck knows how important playing smart football is.

"It's going to cost us down the road. That's just football," Hauck said Saturday. "You can't do dumb things and shoot yourself in the foot. It costs you games."


***

On the flip side, Montana is ranked well in several positive categories among FCS teams.

Three Montana players are ranked in the top 25 in multiple categories.

Junior linebacker Dante Olson's 29 total tackles and 1½ sacks per game average are both ranked No. 3 nationwide. Olson racked up 16 tackles against Drake, which was good for the sixth-highest outing of any FCS defender so far this season.

Junior quarterback Dalton Sneed's name appears highly in four categories. His 28½ completions per game average is ranked No. 5, his total offense average of 324½ yards per game is ranked No. 10, his average of 263 passing yards per game is No. 20 and his completion percentage of 66.3 percent is ranked No. 23.

Sophomore cornerback Dareon Nash is tied for seventh with an average of two passes defended per game. He's tied for first in the FCS with an average of one interception per game. Nash is just one of 23 FCS players so far this season with an interception return touchdown.

As a team, Montana appears in the top 25 in several statistical categories as well.

Montana is one of 28 teams that haven't thrown an interception. The offense is ranked highly in several other categories too: tackles for loss allowed (No. 3) scoring offense (No. 20), completion percentage (No. 21), passing offense (No. 22).

But the defense is where Montana is going to the bank.

The Grizzly defense appears in the top 25 in five categories: passes intercepted (No. 2), passing efficiency for defense (No. 10), rushing defense (No. 17), fumbles recovered (No. 20), total defense (No. 24).

The defense contributes to Montana's fourth-ranked turnover margin and turnovers gained as well. The Grizzlies are currently plus-5 in turnover margin and have gained six turnovers (four interceptions and two recovered fumbles).

And that statistic is one Hauck really cares about.

"It's always huge," Hauck said Saturday of winning the turnover margin. "Statistics I'm not overly into, but that one I am and that one counts. When you take it away and don't give it away, you've got a chance to win for sure."
 
alabamagrizzly said:
daGrizJ said:
Whoa! What! 3rd in the FCS in "tackles for loss allowed". How does that happen?

https://egriz.com/grizboard/viewtopic.php?t=80866

Yeah, I read that before. What's your point? That we have a nationally ranked running game?
 
daGrizJ said:
Whoa! What! 3rd in the FCS in "tackles for loss allowed". How does that happen?
Your wording makes me wonder if you realize that being #3 in that category is a good thing. That is, the Griz are tied for having allowed the third smallest number of TFLs. So I can read your statement in two ways, one being that you think that stat is a bad thing.

But I'm assuming you're wondering how the Griz OL can be so weak (and no one doubts that, least of all Coach Hauck), yet do so well on this stat. That issue came up on another thread. Whatever their weakness in terms of opening holes for Griz running backs, the OL is good at (largely) preventing quick penetrations by the defenders. So, while the backs get stuffed at the line of scrimmage, they are not (officially) being caught in the backfield. Add in Sneed's quick feet and elusiveness and you get low TFLs. They are also tied for #21 in fewest Sacks Allowed: They've allowed just 2 sacks in two games, but many teams have allowed only 1, and 3 have allowed none.
 
daGrizJ said:
alabamagrizzly said:
daGrizJ said:
Whoa! What! 3rd in the FCS in "tackles for loss allowed". How does that happen?

https://egriz.com/grizboard/viewtopic.php?t=80866

Yeah, I read that before. What's your point? That we have a nationally ranked running game?

Sorry, I misread. I thought it was saying we’ve allowed more tackles for loss by other teams. My bad.
 
daGrizJ said:
alabamagrizzly said:
daGrizJ said:
Whoa! What! 3rd in the FCS in "tackles for loss allowed". How does that happen?

https://egriz.com/grizboard/viewtopic.php?t=80866

Yeah, I read that before. What's your point? That we have a nationally ranked running game?

I don't see this as a big deal. 2.5 per game. Allowed 1 for 4 yards in the NI game. Was it a receiver going backwards? Allowed 4 in Drake game. O yards, 1 yards, 4 yards and either 1 or 2 yards. Not many yards lost.

The bigger worry is the number of runs for 0, 1 or 2 yards, especially on 3d and short or 4th and short.
 
PlayerRep said:
... I don't see this as a big deal. 2.5 per game. Allowed 1 for 4 yards in the NI game. Was it a receiver going backwards? Allowed 4 in Drake game. O yards, 1 yards, 4 yards and either 1 or 2 yards. Not many yards lost.

The bigger worry is the number of runs for 0, 1 or 2 yards, especially on 3d and short or 4th and short.
Have already noted that a low TFL Allowed is a good thing, based on how the stat is compiled/defined (on another thread and above).

But I totally agree that the lack of a short-yardage game is a much more critical problem ... and that needs no elaboration. Obviously, we'd all like to see a better overall running game, where we could expect some long gains by the Griz backs. But I think the short-term problem is to devise a way ("jumbo package," or whatever) that the Griz can reliably gain 2 or 3 yards when they really need a first down or are down near the opponent's goal line.
 
IdaGriz01 said:
PlayerRep said:
... I don't see this as a big deal. 2.5 per game. Allowed 1 for 4 yards in the NI game. Was it a receiver going backwards? Allowed 4 in Drake game. O yards, 1 yards, 4 yards and either 1 or 2 yards. Not many yards lost.

The bigger worry is the number of runs for 0, 1 or 2 yards, especially on 3d and short or 4th and short.
Have already noted that a low TFL Allowed is a good thing, based on how the stat is compiled/defined (on another thread and above).

But I totally agree that the lack of a short-yardage game is a much more critical problem ... and that needs no elaboration. Obviously, we'd all like to see a better overall running game, where we could expect some long gains by the Griz backs. But I think the short-term problem is to devise a way ("jumbo package," or whatever) that the Griz can reliably gain 2 or 3 yards when they really need a first down or are down near the opponent's goal line.

Agreed. Thankfully, the short passing game has been super good.
 
PlayerRep said:
IdaGriz01 said:
PlayerRep said:
... I don't see this as a big deal. 2.5 per game. Allowed 1 for 4 yards in the NI game. Was it a receiver going backwards? Allowed 4 in Drake game. O yards, 1 yards, 4 yards and either 1 or 2 yards. Not many yards lost.

The bigger worry is the number of runs for 0, 1 or 2 yards, especially on 3d and short or 4th and short.
Have already noted that a low TFL Allowed is a good thing, based on how the stat is compiled/defined (on another thread and above).

But I totally agree that the lack of a short-yardage game is a much more critical problem ... and that needs no elaboration. Obviously, we'd all like to see a better overall running game, where we could expect some long gains by the Griz backs. But I think the short-term problem is to devise a way ("jumbo package," or whatever) that the Griz can reliably gain 2 or 3 yards when they really need a first down or are down near the opponent's goal line.
Agreed. Thankfully, the short passing game has been super good.
Yep. If it weren't, the Griz might be 1-1 (or even 0-2). Certainly, the way UNI was coming on strong at the end, the Griz needed to run out the clock ... and did it with all short passes. Probably would have still won the Drake game, as long as the defense could hold up with no ball control by the O.
 
Early Stats....mean nothing if the Griz don't improve by the end of the season. Period. The last 3 years really drove that fact home.
 
MTGRZ said:
Early Stats....mean nothing if the Griz don't improve by the end of the season. Period. The last 3 years really drove that fact home.

The Griz are better now than they were the past 2 seasons. Period.

Why do posters say period? Because they think they have said something profound? Period.
 
PlayerRep said:
MTGRZ said:
Early Stats....mean nothing if the Griz don't improve by the end of the season. Period. The last 3 years really drove that fact home.

The Griz are better now than they were the past 2 seasons. Period.

Why do posters say period? Because they think they have said something profound? Period.

Nuff said.
 
Back
Top