so we head into a great time of year--the conference playoffs, followed by my fave sporting event, the big dance. everything is good, except..
..college basketball is struggling. certain venues aside--gonzaga, kansas, duke, kentucky...attendance and ratings are down. where i'll watch just about any college football game, i have almost no interest in most basketball games, not even the great rivalries like duke-carolina, kansas-kansas state. i can't remember the last time i sat down to watch a college basketball game start-to-finish that didn't involve the griz. subtract the partisan interest, and college basketball is pretty much a bum show.
i was reminded of this last night during the telecast of the warriors-mavs game, when jeff van gundy, handed the chance to promote the duke-carolina game on his very own network, instead lit into all of college basketball, saying it had to change or it was going to get worse before it got better. against the backdrop of stephen currie making more dazzling passes, while the rest of the warriors streaked upcourt, his point couldn't have been more emphatic.
and i got to thinking, you know, college football is exciting right now because it's way ahead of the pro game when it comes to pace. i love to watch oregon play, and i'm super-eager to see what stitt brings to our offense. yet even the nba's 24-second clock is an anomoly in these times of instantaneous communication and high-speed travel, while the college shot clock is prehistoric.
so my suggestion is, make the college shot clock 15 seconds. that would really make for an exciting game. and if you think 15 seconds is too short a time, let me tell you, i'm only making a concession to the old guard. i think a better clock would be 12 seconds. that would force players to pass the damned ball, and put a stop to this maddening one-on-one, ego-driven bore that has become college basketball, and much of the nba as well. and if you disagree, take a look--and a stopwatch--to the warriors. they are fun to watch.
..college basketball is struggling. certain venues aside--gonzaga, kansas, duke, kentucky...attendance and ratings are down. where i'll watch just about any college football game, i have almost no interest in most basketball games, not even the great rivalries like duke-carolina, kansas-kansas state. i can't remember the last time i sat down to watch a college basketball game start-to-finish that didn't involve the griz. subtract the partisan interest, and college basketball is pretty much a bum show.
i was reminded of this last night during the telecast of the warriors-mavs game, when jeff van gundy, handed the chance to promote the duke-carolina game on his very own network, instead lit into all of college basketball, saying it had to change or it was going to get worse before it got better. against the backdrop of stephen currie making more dazzling passes, while the rest of the warriors streaked upcourt, his point couldn't have been more emphatic.
and i got to thinking, you know, college football is exciting right now because it's way ahead of the pro game when it comes to pace. i love to watch oregon play, and i'm super-eager to see what stitt brings to our offense. yet even the nba's 24-second clock is an anomoly in these times of instantaneous communication and high-speed travel, while the college shot clock is prehistoric.
so my suggestion is, make the college shot clock 15 seconds. that would really make for an exciting game. and if you think 15 seconds is too short a time, let me tell you, i'm only making a concession to the old guard. i think a better clock would be 12 seconds. that would force players to pass the damned ball, and put a stop to this maddening one-on-one, ego-driven bore that has become college basketball, and much of the nba as well. and if you disagree, take a look--and a stopwatch--to the warriors. they are fun to watch.