• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Best case scenario for the Griz

jodcon said:
Everybody needs to stop with the hand-wringing, if we win the last 2 games we are in regardless of what else happens, if we lose one we are out...it's that simple. I don't buy any conspiracy theory that we miss out at 8-3 by some magic set of circumstances.

Exactly Jodcon., for fuck sake if we do not win out we do not deserve to be in the playoffs period! !!!
We might as well have another fire shitt and semore thread .
 
daGrizJ said:
Stats has the most recent FCS committee rankings and the playoff brackets. Montana is nowhere to be found. Well....ok we are 28th but not in the playoffs.

NAU is.

2 more wins should change that....1 more won't. Must win both
 
Paytonlives said:
zengriz said:
...best case scenario...
...what we really need...
...u cal davis hottie thread...

... :shock: ...


says she is a recent grad....of Davis!
kings-meagan6.jpg



GO KINGS GO :shock:
 
AZDoc said:
daGrizJ said:
Stats has the most recent FCS committee rankings and the playoff brackets. Montana is nowhere to be found. Well....ok we are 28th but not in the playoffs.

NAU is.

That’s their rankings. The committee only has a top 10. This is the same stats that picked nodak first and Poly 3rd. I’ll let the committee decide instead of stats. Truth is that the boys need to get 2 wins. Then let the dust settle everywhere else

Agree on the wins Doc, but perhaps you missed the fact that the rankings are the FCS committee's, not Stats. Not much Montana respect there.
 
Just to clarify a point made earlier, the FCS Committee chooses only 14 teams as there are 10 automatic qualifiers that are in regardless due to winning their conferences automatic bid, usually the conference champion.

What the Committee does do is seed all 24 teams selected, but again they only choose 14 of them.
 
I think we need to evaluate where we are at? Do we want to have to (win out ) every year ,to get in the playoffs? I, for one, don't like this! Montana is better than this! We need to look at a new approach to football in general!!! :( :(
 
i_the_sky said:
I think we need to evaluate where we are at? Do we want to have to (win out ) every year ,to get in the playoffs? I, for one, don't like this! Montana is better than this! We need to look at a new approach to football in general!!! :( :(

Well here is the thing, and its really pretty simple. If you don't win out, then that means someones else did and in fact beat us which makes them the better team so they often times go on to the playoffs while we stay home. So yes you do really need to win out or you have years like last year where you drop a couple of games at the end despite being undefeated up to that point and boom your season is over. In fact I can't remember a season that we went to the playoffs that we didn't need to win to get there................
 
Some have said we need to cheer for the Bobcats today.... but asking me to do that is like expecting Dracula to drink holy water.
 
i_the_sky said:
I think we need to evaluate where we are at? Do we want to have to (win out ) every year ,to get in the playoffs? I, for one, don't like this! Montana is better than this! We need to look at a new approach to football in general!!! :( :(

Yeah because no other UM coaches needed to win games to finish 8-3. I’d suggest doing a quick internet search to determine how many GRIZ teams under all these great former coaches advanced to the playoffs with at least three losses.
 
i_the_sky said:
I think we need to evaluate where we are at? Do we want to have to (win out ) every year ,to get in the playoffs? I, for one, don't like this! Montana is better than this! We need to look at a new approach to football in general!!! :( :(

Are you for f$&king real? Let me plagiarize a movie quote for you to summarize your participation since you've shown up:

"what you’ve just said, like most things you contribute, is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in any of your rambling, incoherent posts are you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this message board, who hasn't already muted you, is dumber for having read it.

But that's the reason you're here, isn't it? (this is how you use a question mark you F$&king drillrod!). Ok, time to band me.
 
bgbigdog said:
i_the_sky said:
I think we need to evaluate where we are at? Do we want to have to (win out ) every year ,to get in the playoffs? I, for one, don't like this! Montana is better than this! We need to look at a new approach to football in general!!! :( :(

Are you for f$&king real? Let me plagiarize a movie quote for you to summarize your participation since you've shown up:

"what you’ve just said, like most things you contribute, is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in any of your rambling, incoherent posts are you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this message board, who hasn't already muted you, is dumber for having read it.

But that's the reason you're here, isn't it? (this is how you use a question mark you F$&king drillrod!). Ok, time to band me.
Wait...we're getting the band back together??
 
jodcon said:
Paytonlives said:
Now she is a cheerleader for LA Kings

kings-meagan4.jpg

Now remember boys, no matter how good she looks or how nice she seems...some guy, somewhere, is sick of her shit.

Probably took a while to get to that point though.

You assume she dates guys. IF she doesn't your entire scenario is flawed.
 
bgbigdog said:
i_the_sky said:
I think we need to evaluate where we are at? Do we want to have to (win out ) every year ,to get in the playoffs? I, for one, don't like this! Montana is better than this! We need to look at a new approach to football in general!!! :( :(

Are you for f$&king real? Let me plagiarize a movie quote for you to summarize your participation since you've shown up:

"what you’ve just said, like most things you contribute, is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in any of your rambling, incoherent posts are you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this message board, who hasn't already muted you, is dumber for having read it.

But that's the reason you're here, isn't it? (this is how you use a question mark you F$&king drillrod!). Ok, time to band me.

Band you? I’d rather nominate this for POTY. :lol:
 
RobGriz said:
bgbigdog said:
i_the_sky said:
I think we need to evaluate where we are at? Do we want to have to (win out ) every year ,to get in the playoffs? I, for one, don't like this! Montana is better than this! We need to look at a new approach to football in general!!! :( :(

Are you for f$&king real? Let me plagiarize a movie quote for you to summarize your participation since you've shown up:

"what you’ve just said, like most things you contribute, is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in any of your rambling, incoherent posts are you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this message board, who hasn't already muted you, is dumber for having read it.

But that's the reason you're here, isn't it? (this is how you use a question mark you F$&king drillrod!). Ok, time to band me.
Wait...we're getting the banned back together??
FIFY
 
i_the_sky said:
I think we need to evaluate where we are at? Do we want to have to (win out ) every year ,to get in the playoffs? I, for one, don't like this! Montana is better than this! We need to look at a new approach to football in general!!! :( :(

Just a warning, this poster is based out of a lab outside of Moscow. These are the same posters that helped you guys hate each other in the last election.
 
SaskGriz said:
i_the_sky said:
I think we need to evaluate where we are at? Do we want to have to (win out ) every year ,to get in the playoffs? I, for one, don't like this! Montana is better than this! We need to look at a new approach to football in general!!! :( :(

Just a warning, this poster is based out of a lab outside of Moscow. These are the same posters that helped you guys hate each other in the last election.

:lol: :clap:
 
Back
Top