October 06, 2002 12:00 am • By RIAL CUMMINGS of the Missoulian
Montana Grizzly football fans can consider themselves lucky for many reasons. One is that they aren't in Moscow, Idaho, shaking pompons for the Vandals.
The border rivals, only 142 miles apart and similar in enrollment and resources, have a competitive history dating back to 1903. Their last four meetings have been decided by a touchdown or less, including the Grizzlies' 38-31 victory Saturday. Turn to USA Today this week, and you found Montana ranked 88th in the nation (among all Division I teams) and Idaho 89th in the Sagarin computer ratings.
But their present records - and future prospects - couldn't be more different. The difference is that Idaho is officially "big time," a I-A school, while I-AA Montana isn't. Oh, you lucky Griz.
There are 121 colleges playing Division I-AA football this fall, and the defending national champion Griz, who went 15-1 last season, rule the food chain. There are 117 colleges playing Division I-A football, and the Vandals, who went 1-10 last season and stand 1-5 this year, are bottom feeders.
Idaho left Montana behind in 1996, jumping to the supposedly richer pastures of I-A football to join ex-Big Sky members Nevada-Reno and Boise State. Where are those three today? Football fever is only a memory in Reno, where the Wolf Pack has endured three straight losing seasons for the first time in 40 years. Boise has been successful on the field, and snubbed off it - the Broncos went 8-4 last year and didn't even get an invite to the hometown Humanitarian Bowl.
Idaho? The Vandals are adrift in a nowhere conference, the Sun Belt, with "rivals" such as Middle Tennessee State, Louisiana-Monroe and Arkansas State. It's great if you're into gumbo and grits, but not so hot if you have a travel budget. For the first time in three years, the Vandals have been permitted by I-A attendance rules to move their games from larger Martin Stadium in neighboring Pullman, Wash., back to their on-campus Kibbie Dome. However, the Kibbie Dome seats only 16,000 with little room for growth, and it wasn't even close to capacity Saturday.
By contrast, Montana is in a stable conference, with recognizable (if not always scintillating) rivals, and football excitement has never been higher. Griz tickets are arguably the most prized possessions in a town where a third of the population, close to 20,000 folks, packs the stadium on autumn Saturdays to watch a team that has won 19 straight games, claimed four consecutive conference championships and played for the national I-AA crown four times in the past seven years.
Idaho jumped to I-A because boosters insisted on keeping up with Boise State. The move made sense for BSU, the only game in town in a thriving metropolitan area. Moscow is metropolitan only if you consider Potlach a suburb.
So now Idaho is not only getting pounded, but paying through the nose for the privilege of competing in a conference it can't stand. Meanwhile, it has to shell out $13 million worth of improvements to its facilities, and boost fund raising for scholarships from $1.1 million to $1.8 million.
Even then, there's no guarantee that the Vandals will be able to meet new NCAA rules requiring I-A schools, by 2004, to stage five home football games against I-A foes; sponsor 16 sports and 200 athletic scholarships; draw 15,000 actual attendance for home football games; and fund at least 90 percent of the maximum of football scholarships (85).
The Bowl Championship Series conferences dominate I-A football, and they're going to do everything possible to avoid sharing the wealth with urchins like Idaho.
Look at the record. Only one I-AA school, Marshall, has been able to make a successful transition to I-A.
But it's all worth it, right? Because even if Idaho has to endure beatings from BCS teams like Washington or Oregon in return for $400,000 guarantees, the Vandals will wind up rolling in dough. Right?
Not really. Division I-A schools do, on average, make more money than I-AAs. But erase the incredibly rich BCS schools from the skewed averages, and there's hardly any difference. An NCAA study has concluded that the bottom 25 percent of I-A schools (such as Idaho) averaged roughly $5,000 more in revenue than the top 25 percent of I-AA schools (such as Montana). And here's the kicker - the I-A schools spent, on average, roughly $1 million more to gain that slim edge.
Idaho's chances of reaping any kind of bowl bonanza are dubious. And the Vandals' biggest source of football revenue, guarantee games, may be curtailed.
If the Griz wanted to move up to I-A, they certainly could be competitive, at least with the no-names like Idaho. They could also say sayonara to seven home games (or eight, or nine, or 10, depending on their playoff success) and a dynasty that is the envy of their peers.
Are the Griz misguided enough to follow the Vandals? Let's hope not.