IdaGriz01 said:By bad ... over-reacted.hm.grwn.grizfan said:I know, very well written article. I read that when it was first released. Didn't mean to stir a hornets nest, so if that ruffled your feathers I apologize.IdaGriz01 said:Technically true. Still, I'm so sick of people bringing this up. At the first trial, there was only one hold-out for a guilty verdict. If I read the account correctly, the final results -- including on a manslaughter charge the prosecution tossed in to get some kind of conviction -- was unanimous for "not guilty." Here's a very long, but telling (and award-winning) article about what Wilson went through during the period. He suffered ... so STHU.hm.grwn.grizfan said:At least the majority of the jurors![]()
http://www.hearstfdn.org/hearst_journalism/competitions.php?type=Writing&year=2010&id=13![]()
I missed the fact that you added the "majority" quote to your own posting about the jury verdict.
:lol: No worries