WILDCATFAN said:get'em_griz said:AZGrizFan said:UTGrizFan said:I like thebidea of either 12-14 teams and then have 2 Divisions for scheduling purposes. For example:
NORTH
-Montana, MSU, Idaho, ISU, EWU, PSU, UNC
SOUTH
Weber State, SUU, Cal Poly, UC Davis, Sac State, NAU, *San Diego (Example)
Play all 6 other teams from your divison every year to solve the rivalry game issue (some rivalries will have to be sacrificed but SUU vs WSU seems bigger then ISU vs WSU nowadays) and 2-3 from the opposite Divison every year on top of OOC Scheduling.
Again the Divison format is only in reference to teams you play every year.
All that division does is exacerbate the unbalanced schedule we have now.
If it ever got to that point of splitting he conference, I'd rather see the "south" division just become its own conference. Then we'd no longer have to be worried about an unbalanced schedule.
So you'd rather play Portland State than Weber State every year? Football and Basketball?
I would rather swap out UNC with Weber State.