• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Griz Predicted to go 6-16 over last 22 games

CleanHOUSE said:
Buttegrizzle said:
ESPN knows diddly about the BSC. Willing to bet their prognosticator couldn’t even name all the schools and what state they are from (hint Weber is not a state). $ says they might go to one BSC game a year. Year in and year out their NCAA announcers talk about the “Montana State Grizzlies” in the Big Dance like they are there for the first time, or talk about the Montana Grizzlies “from Bozeman” blah blah blah.
When EA first put the Griz ing NCAA Football the announcer would say Montana State Grizzlies lol. That being said the win predictor has no human input just formula based on stats. If you think there is a Human at ESPN making predictions about Bigsky games you are assuming way more importance than they would ever give BSC.
Or any 1-AA conference, for that matter. If fact, those numbers may all be computer-generated. They leave it to their human staff writers to do more nuanced analyses ... and those mostly focus on the ranked or near-ranked teams.
 
IdaGriz01 said:
CleanHOUSE said:
Buttegrizzle said:
ESPN knows diddly about the BSC. Willing to bet their prognosticator couldn’t even name all the schools and what state they are from (hint Weber is not a state). $ says they might go to one BSC game a year. Year in and year out their NCAA announcers talk about the “Montana State Grizzlies” in the Big Dance like they are there for the first time, or talk about the Montana Grizzlies “from Bozeman” blah blah blah.
When EA first put the Griz ing NCAA Football the announcer would say Montana State Grizzlies lol. That being said the win predictor has no human input just formula based on stats. If you think there is a Human at ESPN making predictions about Bigsky games you are assuming way more importance than they would ever give BSC.
Or any 1-AA conference, for that matter. If fact, those numbers may all be computer-generated. They leave it to their human staff writers to do more nuanced analyses ... and those mostly focus on the ranked or near-ranked teams.

They absolutely are all computer generated.
 
Back
Top