putter said:CWU and Moorhead State? Guess the Athletic Department wanted some extra cushion in the coffers next year. Montana will have to have a strong record for the playoffs next year with that lineup
putter said:CWU and Moorhead State? Guess the Athletic Department wanted some extra cushion in the coffers next year. Montana will have to have a strong record for the playoffs next year with that lineup
MSU lost their last game with CWU 31-16 in Bozeman.The.Real.2506 said:putter said:CWU and Moorhead State? Guess the Athletic Department wanted some extra cushion in the coffers next year. Montana will have to have a strong record for the playoffs next year with that lineup
bobby's preferred schedule coming online, look forward to a DII every year from here on
The.Real.2506 said:putter said:CWU and Moorhead State? Guess the Athletic Department wanted some extra cushion in the coffers next year. Montana will have to have a strong record for the playoffs next year with that lineup
bobby's preferred schedule coming online, look forward to a DII every year from here on
Agreed. However, I will point out that Morehead State is a D-I opponent. From the crappy Pioneer League, but still FCS.putter said:CWU and Moorhead State? Guess the Athletic Department wanted some extra cushion in the coffers next year. Montana will have to have a strong record for the playoffs next year with that lineup
putter said:CWU and Moorhead State? Guess the Athletic Department wanted some extra cushion in the coffers next year. Montana will have to have a strong record for the playoffs next year with that lineup
IdaGriz01 said:Agreed. However, I will point out that Morehead State is a D-I opponent. From the crappy Pioneer League, but still FCS.putter said:CWU and Moorhead State? Guess the Athletic Department wanted some extra cushion in the coffers next year. Montana will have to have a strong record for the playoffs next year with that lineup
uofmman1122 said:It's tough to say definitively this early, because for all we know, our starting QB may not be on the roster right now (for the record, Cole Bergquist is the only non-FBS QB to start a season as the starter under Bobby Hauck, although I'm counting Roper, even though he split time with Selle. Although I do suppose Humphrey is also technically an FBS dropdown).
The.Real.2506 said:putter said:CWU and Moorhead State? Guess the Athletic Department wanted some extra cushion in the coffers next year. Montana will have to have a strong record for the playoffs next year with that lineup
bobby's preferred schedule coming online, look forward to a DII every year from here on
Right? At the time, it didn't seem all that weird, but if you think about it, Bobby always had a drop down QB.AZGrizFan said:uofmman1122 said:It's tough to say definitively this early, because for all we know, our starting QB may not be on the roster right now (for the record, Cole Bergquist is the only non-FBS QB to start a season as the starter under Bobby Hauck, although I'm counting Roper, even though he split time with Selle. Although I do suppose Humphrey is also technically an FBS dropdown).
That is just a weird, weird stat. Went back and looked at the 2009 season...very strange, the QB rotation. I don’t remember Roper playing that much, but I guess that’s just me.