• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Oh, The Irony!

hunt-ducks said:
MontanaJack2006 said:
Defense is actually pretty good this year.
Click to expand...

The Bobcat O-Coordinator has to be salivating at the prospect of playing against our vaunted 3-3-5 defense, which is designed to stop the spread, but has been unable to do so, and is weak in stopping the run, and has shown no ability to do so versus the Cats for three years........ :lol:
Click to expand...

There you go again. Living in my head, rent free.
 
AZGrizFan said:
hunt-ducks said:
Yeah, our 3-3-5 defense "wreaked havoc" on both EWU and Sac. State! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!
Click to expand...

71
63
34
50
62

Those are EWU's scores against FCS competition. One of those is not like the other. Their average (minus UM game) is 61.5 ppg. We held them to 27.5 points BELOW their season average. Sooooo, something about our defense worked that day...
Click to expand...

Most of those teams where they put up video game numbers are..... shitty.
 
AZGrizFan said:
hunt-ducks said:
Yeah, our 3-3-5 defense "wreaked havoc" on both EWU and Sac. State! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!
Click to expand...

71
63
34
50
62

Those are EWU's scores against FCS competition. One of those is not like the other. Their average (minus UM game) is 61.5 ppg. We held them to 27.5 points BELOW their season average. Sooooo, something about our defense worked that day...
Click to expand...

Most of those teams where they put up video game numbers are..... shitty.
 
poorgriz said:
AZGrizFan said:
71
63
34
50
62

Those are EWU's scores against FCS competition. One of those is not like the other. Their average (minus UM game) is 61.5 ppg. We held them to 27.5 points BELOW their season average. Sooooo, something about our defense worked that day...
Click to expand...

Most of those teams where they put up video game numbers are..... shitty.
Click to expand...

Still doesn't change the fact that a healthy Montana D kept Eastern almost 4 scores below their average. MSU has a good D but their entire schedule, so far, has been against shitty teams
 
poorgriz said:
AZGrizFan said:
71
63
34
50
62

Those are EWU's scores against FCS competition. One of those is not like the other. Their average (minus UM game) is 61.5 ppg. We held them to 27.5 points BELOW their season average. Sooooo, something about our defense worked that day...
Click to expand...

Most of those teams where they put up video game numbers are..... shitty.
Click to expand...

Ew-U is averaging 628 yards per game. Care to make any predictions for their yardage against the cats?
 
AZGrizFan said:
hunt-ducks said:
Yeah, our 3-3-5 defense "wreaked havoc" on both EWU and Sac. State! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!
Click to expand...

71
63
34
50
62

Those are EWU's scores against FCS competition. One of those is not like the other. Their average (minus UM game) is 61.5 ppg. We held them to 27.5 points BELOW their season average. Sooooo, something about our defense worked that day...
Click to expand...

Good point, and UM played EWU when they were much more healthy. Not so much against Sac. EWU is #36 in rushing to date, #1 passing, and #1 over all on offense. I believe they run the ball more to rest the receivers than anything else! :lol: I'm Bear Spray and I didn't plagerize this post!
 
poorgriz said:
AZGrizFan said:
71
63
34
50
62

Those are EWU's scores against FCS competition. One of those is not like the other. Their average (minus UM game) is 61.5 ppg. We held them to 27.5 points BELOW their season average. Sooooo, something about our defense worked that day...
Click to expand...

Most of those teams where they put up video game numbers are..... shitty.
Click to expand...

well if there's one thing a 'Scat fan would know about it's shitty opponents. You've had nothing BUT this year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top