• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

McGhee New Recruiting Coordinator at MSU

SoldierGriz said:
MissoulaMarinerFan said:
CDAGRIZ said:
poorgriz said:
Ya, just getting to the playoffs isn't nearly good enough for what Choate is going to do.

That is incorrect.
With his demonstrated ability to get to the playoffs 1/3 of the time and rack up a stunning 17 wins in a mere three seasons, Choach is right in the sweet spot in Bozeman. He has that fan base and community figured out, and will be the coach for many years. It's a freakin' case study, actually. Here's how he's done it thus far:

I. Introduction:
With a historically middling program like MSU, a new HC has an incredible opportunity to maximize his longevity. Fans, and more importantly, administrators, will show amazing patience if you can (1) Manage expectations, and (2) Always have a scapegoat.

II. Method
A. Managing Expectations:
-First, you must manage the expectations of the fans and administration. This begins from the first time you step on campus after accepting the offer. In every interview or press conference, the key is to indirectly trash the previous coach by indicating that the "dramatic change in program culture" will "take some time". It's critical to point only to intangible things at this stage. "Bringing the toughness back" and "Playing with discipline for a change" are two great lines. Do NOT be afraid of throwing in "hard-nosed" or "grit" whenever you can. These things allow you to differentiate yourself from the guy who got fired without directly saying he sucked (you cannot afford to alienate the ~25% of fans who liked the last guy and are skeptical of you at this stage), without actually doing anything at all.

Going into your first two seasons, you simply cannot afford to have a lot of early success. Your mantras are "baby steps" and "improve every day" and "something about the speed at which Rome was constructed". Remember, these are not "your guys". They are the last guy's guys. Going over .500 with them can set you up for later failure. You don't want to wake up in year 5 with all of "your guys" in place and do worse than you did with the last guy's guys. Winning too early is preemptive job suicide. If you have your first losing season in year 5 or later, you've failed to manage the expectations for a historically middling program, and will likely be shown the door. Remember the last guy? The great thing about your position at a historically middling program is you have the unique opportunity to secure the fan base's devotion by beating a rival who has dominated your program for decades. Do that, and all will be forgiven. You can point to that as "progress" without peaking too early. The state of the rival's program doesn't matter. Yours is a historically middling program, remember? Your fans are not used to beating the rival. Don't be surprised if you get offered an extension. Finally, schedule a can't-win game for year 4. More on that later.

By year 3, you've had a chance to install your "culture of toughness and passion", you've received your extension, so the fan base and administration will want to see some results. You have a good mix of your guys, and now would be the perfect time to have your first winning season. BUT, it's absolutely vital that you DO NOT to do too much at this stage. All you have to do is throw them a bone to show you're getting it. A gentleman's 7-4 will do nicely. You can take all the credit, and the fan base will believe you. Beating the rival in year 3 is not as important as it was the first two years, but it's a nice plus. Go 9-2 and make a deep run at this stage, and you dig your own grave. You could easily and unintentionally regress the next year, and it's curtains for you. Remember the last guy? To that end, If you can manufacture an overarching excuse to make the base believe you could've easily gone 9-2 "if only . . .", you're golden. A good way to achieve this is to make a defensive star play QB. You're the HC, he's your guy, and you make the decisions. This leads nicely to Always Have a Scapegoat.

B. Always Have a Scapegoat
You've done your job perfectly to this point. Congratulations! The upside, is the fan base is riled. The downside is the fan base is riled. But, you need a new Scapegoat. The last guy's damage to the program culture will no longer fly. Luckily for you, you bought some insurance last season that will come in very handy. Remember that defensive star you demanded play QB last season? Yeah, well, that gives you the Genesis of your season 4 Scapegoat; an oft overlooked building block to job longevity at a historically middling program.

With any luck at all, the DC will not have been too pleased that you took his best player on D and put him behind center all season in year 3. If you can have a few dust-ups behind closed doors, it will hopefully lead to the DC's departure. The reason will not be important. Whose decision it was will not be important. Your fans trust you now, so don't ever give away that it's a part of the plan. With the DC leaving, it will be a perfect time to shake-up the staff in the offseason between years 3 and 4. Maybe have 4 new coaches, have a large percentage of existing coaches change positions, and generally Now, you've purchased a full insurance policy for year 4, or, what we call in the biz: A Scapegoat. You still have to produce in year 4, but any step back can now be blamed on the coaching shake-up. The new coaches have to get used to their new roles, but that's not your fault. That can't-win game you scheduled way back when will come in handy here, as well. 5-7 or 6-6 will do nicely here. Remember, nobody will blame this setback on you.

III. Conclusion
Hopefully, by the end of year 4, you'll be set up nicely at your historically middling program. You still have time left on your contract extension. You've made sure the fan base and administration still believes in you because (a) you've managed their expectations, and (b) you've always maintained a scapegoat. Further, you haven't really had to do anything of note. Hell, you're still under .500 as a coach, and still going strong! You can start the "process" over to some extent now. Repeat this process as necessary. You've successfully laid the groundwork for your fans to believe this simple truth: Any step forward is to your credit, and any step back is not your fault. It's not a lie if the suckers believe it. Do this correctly, and you'll likely get a statue by being barely over .500. Good luck!

HOLY SHIT! POTY. :lol: :clap:

This might be the best post ever placed in the interwebs. Wow. POTY.

It may also be the first post edited 7 times in first day. It gets better every hour. Ha.
 
PlayerRep said:
SoldierGriz said:
MissoulaMarinerFan said:
CDAGRIZ said:
That is incorrect.
With his demonstrated ability to get to the playoffs 1/3 of the time and rack up a stunning 17 wins in a mere three seasons, Choach is right in the sweet spot in Bozeman. He has that fan base and community figured out, and will be the coach for many years. It's a freakin' case study, actually. Here's how he's done it thus far:

I. Introduction:
With a historically middling program like MSU, a new HC has an incredible opportunity to maximize his longevity. Fans, and more importantly, administrators, will show amazing patience if you can (1) Manage expectations, and (2) Always have a scapegoat.

II. Method
A. Managing Expectations:
-First, you must manage the expectations of the fans and administration. This begins from the first time you step on campus after accepting the offer. In every interview or press conference, the key is to indirectly trash the previous coach by indicating that the "dramatic change in program culture" will "take some time". It's critical to point only to intangible things at this stage. "Bringing the toughness back" and "Playing with discipline for a change" are two great lines. Do NOT be afraid of throwing in "hard-nosed" or "grit" whenever you can. These things allow you to differentiate yourself from the guy who got fired without directly saying he sucked (you cannot afford to alienate the ~25% of fans who liked the last guy and are skeptical of you at this stage), without actually doing anything at all.

Going into your first two seasons, you simply cannot afford to have a lot of early success. Your mantras are "baby steps" and "improve every day" and "something about the speed at which Rome was constructed". Remember, these are not "your guys". They are the last guy's guys. Going over .500 with them can set you up for later failure. You don't want to wake up in year 5 with all of "your guys" in place and do worse than you did with the last guy's guys. Winning too early is preemptive job suicide. If you have your first losing season in year 5 or later, you've failed to manage the expectations for a historically middling program, and will likely be shown the door. Remember the last guy? The great thing about your position at a historically middling program is you have the unique opportunity to secure the fan base's devotion by beating a rival who has dominated your program for decades. Do that, and all will be forgiven. You can point to that as "progress" without peaking too early. The state of the rival's program doesn't matter. Yours is a historically middling program, remember? Your fans are not used to beating the rival. Don't be surprised if you get offered an extension. Finally, schedule a can't-win game for year 4. More on that later.

By year 3, you've had a chance to install your "culture of toughness and passion", you've received your extension, so the fan base and administration will want to see some results. You have a good mix of your guys, and now would be the perfect time to have your first winning season. BUT, it's absolutely vital that you DO NOT to do too much at this stage. All you have to do is throw them a bone to show you're getting it. A gentleman's 7-4 will do nicely. You can take all the credit, and the fan base will believe you. Beating the rival in year 3 is not as important as it was the first two years, but it's a nice plus. Go 9-2 and make a deep run at this stage, and you dig your own grave. You could easily and unintentionally regress the next year, and it's curtains for you. Remember the last guy? To that end, If you can manufacture an overarching excuse to make the base believe you could've easily gone 9-2 "if only . . .", you're golden. A good way to achieve this is to make a defensive star play QB. You're the HC, he's your guy, and you make the decisions. This leads nicely to Always Have a Scapegoat.

B. Always Have a Scapegoat
You've done your job perfectly to this point. Congratulations! The upside, is the fan base is riled. The downside is the fan base is riled. But, you need a new Scapegoat. The last guy's damage to the program culture will no longer fly. Luckily for you, you bought some insurance last season that will come in very handy. Remember that defensive star you demanded play QB last season? Yeah, well, that gives you the Genesis of your season 4 Scapegoat; an oft overlooked building block to job longevity at a historically middling program.

With any luck at all, the DC will not have been too pleased that you took his best player on D and put him behind center all season in year 3. If you can have a few dust-ups behind closed doors, it will hopefully lead to the DC's departure. The reason will not be important. Whose decision it was will not be important. Your fans trust you now, so don't ever give away that it's a part of the plan. With the DC leaving, it will be a perfect time to shake-up the staff in the offseason between years 3 and 4. Maybe have 4 new coaches, have a large percentage of existing coaches change positions, and generally Now, you've purchased a full insurance policy for year 4, or, what we call in the biz: A Scapegoat. You still have to produce in year 4, but any step back can now be blamed on the coaching shake-up. The new coaches have to get used to their new roles, but that's not your fault. That can't-win game you scheduled way back when will come in handy here, as well. 5-7 or 6-6 will do nicely here. Remember, nobody will blame this setback on you.

III. Conclusion
Hopefully, by the end of year 4, you'll be set up nicely at your historically middling program. You still have time left on your contract extension. You've made sure the fan base and administration still believes in you because (a) you've managed their expectations, and (b) you've always maintained a scapegoat. Further, you haven't really had to do anything of note. Hell, you're still under .500 as a coach, and still going strong! You can start the "process" over to some extent now. Repeat this process as necessary. You've successfully laid the groundwork for your fans to believe this simple truth: Any step forward is to your credit, and any step back is not your fault. It's not a lie if the suckers believe it. Do this correctly, and you'll likely get a statue by being barely over .500. Good luck!

HOLY SHIT! POTY. :lol: :clap:

This might be the best post ever placed in the interwebs. Wow. POTY.

It may also be the first post edited 7 times in first day. It gets better every hour. Ha.

:D Sorry, PR! Had some very unbecoming typos in there that simply couldn't stand, and I wanted to add some words. I should've done it all at once.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
PlayerRep said:
SoldierGriz said:
MissoulaMarinerFan said:
HOLY SHIT! POTY. :lol: :clap:

This might be the best post ever placed in the interwebs. Wow. POTY.

It may also be the first post edited 7 times in first day. It gets better every hour. Ha.

:D Sorry, PR! Had some very unbecoming typos in there that simply couldn't stand, and I wanted to add some words. I should've done it all at once.
[/quote


Ha! This is the ultimate post by CDA of total Bobcat envy. Love it!! Keep it up CDA!!! 👍🤣🍺
 
33, I know you’re one of the most astute regular posters here on eGriz.com, so I know you’ll get this: It’s Choach Envy, and I’m not the least bit afraid to admit it. He’s got it sorted so well. He might be the first CFB coach at a public institution who truly knows how to act like a proper government employee, so to speak. It’s so genius.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
33, I know you’re one of the most astute regular posters here on eGriz.com, so I know you’ll get this: It’s Choach Envy, and I’m not the least bit afraid to admit it. He’s got it sorted so well. He might be the first CFB coach at a public institution who truly knows how to act like a proper government employee, so to speak. It’s so genius.
[/quote

Sorry CDA, but I do not see the difference between him and any other coach, including Hauck in managing expectations or any other aspect of being a head coach. Choate was left with not much when he came in and has been successful in his rebuilding. It is now coming all together. If he falls now, it is on him. Don’t think it will happen.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
poorgriz said:
MissoulaMarinerFan said:
bigsky33 said:
That offense got the Cats to the playoffs. Did the Griz offense get them to the playoffs?
It sure didn't. Yours did and your coach may be going away from that...for some reason. :?:

Ya, just getting to the playoffs isn't nearly good enough for what Choate is going to do.

That is incorrect.
With his demonstrated ability to get to the playoffs 1/3 of the time and rack up a stunning 17 wins in a mere three seasons, Choach is right in the sweet spot in Bozeman. He has that fan base and community figured out, and will be the coach for many years. It's a freakin' case study, actually. Here's how he's done it thus far:

I. Introduction:
With a historically middling program like MSU, a new HC has an incredible opportunity to maximize his longevity. Fans, and more importantly, administrators, will show amazing patience if you can (a) Manage expectations, and (b) Always have a scapegoat.

II. Method
A. Managing Expectations:
-First, you must manage the expectations of the fans and administration. This begins from the first time you step on campus after accepting the offer. In every interview or press conference, the key is to indirectly trash the previous coach by indicating that the "dramatic change in program culture" will "take some time". It's critical to point only to intangible things at this stage. "Bringing the toughness back" and "Playing with discipline for a change" are two great lines. Do NOT be afraid of throwing in "hard-nosed" or "grit" whenever you can. These things allow you to differentiate yourself from the guy who got fired without directly saying he sucked (you cannot afford to alienate the ~25% of fans who liked the last guy and are skeptical of you at this stage), without actually doing anything at all.

Going into your first two seasons, you simply cannot afford to have a lot of early success. Your mantras are "baby steps" and "improve every day" and "something about the speed at which Rome was constructed". Remember, these are not "your guys". They are the last guy's guys. Going over .500 with them can set you up for later failure. You don't want to wake up in year 5 with all of "your guys" in place and do worse than you did with the last guy's guys. Winning too early is preemptive job suicide. If you have your first losing season in year 5 or later, you've failed to manage the expectations for a historically middling program, and will likely be shown the door. Remember the last guy? It's a delicate balance between making fans think their program IS elite, versus thinking that it WILL BE elite someday if they stick with you. You want the latter. Don't showboat in the first two years.

The great thing about your position at a historically middling program is you have the unique opportunity to secure the fan base's devotion by beating a rival who has dominated your program for decades. Do that, and all will be forgiven. You can point to that as "progress" without peaking too early. The state of the rival's program doesn't matter. Yours is a historically middling program, remember? Your fans are not used to beating the rival. Don't be surprised if you get offered an extension. Finally, schedule a can't-win game for year 4. More on that later.

By year 3, you've had a chance to install your "culture of toughness and passion", you've received your extension, so the fan base and administration will want to see some results. You have a good mix of your guys, and now would be the perfect time to have your first winning season. BUT, it's absolutely vital that you DO NOT to do too much at this stage. All you have to do is throw them a bone to show you're getting it. A gentleman's 7-4 will do nicely. You can take all the credit, and the fan base will believe you. Beating the rival in year 3 is not as important as it was the first two years, but it's a nice plus. Go 9-2 and make a deep run at this stage, and you dig your own grave. You could easily and unintentionally regress the next year, and it's curtains for you. Again, remember the last guy? To that end, If you can manufacture an overarching excuse to make the base believe you could've easily gone 9-2 "if only . . .", you're golden. A good way to achieve this is to make a defensive star play QB. You're the HC, he's your guy, and you make the decisions. This leads nicely to Always Have a Scapegoat.

B. Always Have a Scapegoat
You've done your job perfectly to this point. Congratulations! The upside, is the fan base is riled. The downside is the fan base is riled. But, you need a new Scapegoat. The last guy's damage to the program culture will no longer fly. Luckily for you, you bought some insurance last season that will come in very handy. Remember that defensive star you demanded play QB last season? Yeah, well, that gives you the Genesis of your season 4 Scapegoat; an oft overlooked building block to job longevity at a historically middling program.

With any luck at all, the DC will not have been too pleased that you took his best player on D and put him behind center all season in year 3. If you can have a few dust-ups behind closed doors, it will hopefully lead to the DC's departure. The reason will not be important. Whose decision it was will not be important. Your fans trust you now, so don't ever give away that it's a part of the plan. With the DC leaving, it will be a perfect time to shake-up the staff in the offseason between years 3 and 4. Maybe have 4 new coaches, have a large percentage of existing coaches change positions, and generally leak the notion of disarray that wasn't your fault. Now, you've purchased a full insurance policy for year 4, or, what we call in the biz: A Brand New Scapegoat. You still have to produce in year 4, but any step back can now be blamed on the coaching shake-up. The new coaches have to get used to their new roles, but that's not your fault. That can't-win game you scheduled way back when will come in handy here, as well. 5-7 or 6-6 will do nicely here. Remember, nobody will blame this setback on you.

III. Conclusion
Hopefully, by the end of year 4, you'll be set up nicely at your historically middling program. You still have time left on your contract extension. You've made sure the fan base and administration still believes in you because (a) you've managed their expectations, and (b) you've always maintained a scapegoat. Further, you haven't really had to do anything of note. Hell, you're still under .500 as a coach, and still going strong! You can start the "process" over to some extent now. Repeat this process as necessary. You've successfully laid the groundwork for your fans to believe this simple truth: Any step forward is to your credit, and any step back is not your fault. It's not a lie if the suckers believe it. Do this correctly, and you'll likely get a statue at the end of year 8 for being barely over .500 for your career. Good luck!

You have had some incredible posts over the years, up to and including some of your reinvented lyrics to rap songs like “Regulators”, “Nuthin But a G Thang”, and Gangsta’s Paradise.” This, however, is your finest work....ever.

Game Set Match. POTY x 10. Mic Drop Moment.
 
hBjlYaD.jpg
 
bigsky33 said:
CDAGRIZ said:
33, I know you’re one of the most astute regular posters here on eGriz.com, so I know you’ll get this: It’s Choach Envy, and I’m not the least bit afraid to admit it. He’s got it sorted so well. He might be the first CFB coach at a public institution who truly knows how to act like a proper government employee, so to speak. It’s so genius.

Sorry CDA, but I do not see the difference between him and any other coach, including Hauck in managing expectations or any other aspect of being a head coach. Choate was left with not much when he came in and has been successful in his rebuilding. It is now coming all together. If he falls now, it is on him. Don’t think it will happen.

The plan works.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
bigsky33 said:
CDAGRIZ said:
33, I know you’re one of the most astute regular posters here on eGriz.com, so I know you’ll get this: It’s Choach Envy, and I’m not the least bit afraid to admit it. He’s got it sorted so well. He might be the first CFB coach at a public institution who truly knows how to act like a proper government employee, so to speak. It’s so genius.

Sorry CDA, but I do not see the difference between him and any other coach, including Hauck in managing expectations or any other aspect of being a head coach. Choate was left with not much when he came in and has been successful in his rebuilding. It is now coming all together. If he falls now, it is on him. Don’t think it will happen.

The plan works.

Choate will get a lifetime contract if he can do 2 things

1) find a QB that can throw a pass longer than his own arm.

2) get Dane Fletcher to pay for players pictures to be put on the brand new Outhouses that we get next year.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
ilovethecats said:
Griz til I die said:
Copper Griz said:
Gregorak’s departure was and is not a positive. Slice it any damn way you want. Not good. KI will be a good coach eventually. Emphasis on eventually.
I’m pretty sure KI was the reason Ash got fired in 2015. I’m sure he will be better this time after being at UW for 2 years but as of right now I don’t think he is better than Gregorak. We’ll see. He may end up being better, but going off of what we’ve seen it think Gregorak better.

Of the reasons they finally decided to part ways with Ash I'm not sure Kane would crack the top 10.

Can you name 7 reasons not involving Ioanee why they parted ways with the winningest coach in about 50 years of program history, winner of half of the program's conference titles since 1984, the coach with more FCS Playoff appearances than any coach in program history, after his one and only losing season (both conference and overall)?

EDIT: I know you can name some "reasons", but there are always "reasons" and THE reason. I think we all know THE reason, but, understandably, nobody in Bozeman wants to admit it.

Yes
 
ilovethecats said:
CDAGRIZ said:
ilovethecats said:
Griz til I die said:
I’m pretty sure KI was the reason Ash got fired in 2015. I’m sure he will be better this time after being at UW for 2 years but as of right now I don’t think he is better than Gregorak. We’ll see. He may end up being better, but going off of what we’ve seen it think Gregorak better.

Of the reasons they finally decided to part ways with Ash I'm not sure Kane would crack the top 10.

Can you name 7 reasons not involving Ioanee why they parted ways with the winningest coach in about 50 years of program history, winner of half of the program's conference titles since 1984, the coach with more FCS Playoff appearances than any coach in program history, after his one and only losing season (both conference and overall)?

EDIT: I know you can name some "reasons", but there are always "reasons" and THE reason. I think we all know THE reason, but, understandably, nobody in Bozeman wants to admit it.

Yes

Oh, good. Thank goodness.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

The floor is yours.
Pro tip: Throw "program culture" in a few of them.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
The state of the rival's program doesn't matter.
Bravo btw. I especially liked this bit. It’s oh so true as evident in this very thread. Every C.A.T. tried arguing that their Doritos Locos Taco Offense beat our Town Pump Burrito Offense like that proves anything other than the shits
 
CDAGRIZ said:
ilovethecats said:
CDAGRIZ said:
ilovethecats said:
Of the reasons they finally decided to part ways with Ash I'm not sure Kane would crack the top 10.

Can you name 7 reasons not involving Ioanee why they parted ways with the winningest coach in about 50 years of program history, winner of half of the program's conference titles since 1984, the coach with more FCS Playoff appearances than any coach in program history, after his one and only losing season (both conference and overall)?

EDIT: I know you can name some "reasons", but there are always "reasons" and THE reason. I think we all know THE reason, but, understandably, nobody in Bozeman wants to admit it.

Yes

Oh, good. Thank goodness.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

The floor is yours.
Pro tip: Throw "program culture" in a few of them.
Looking forward to his list. Throw in “toughness” in a few of them also.
 
WaGriz4life said:
CDAGRIZ said:
ilovethecats said:
CDAGRIZ said:
Can you name 7 reasons not involving Ioanee why they parted ways with the winningest coach in about 50 years of program history, winner of half of the program's conference titles since 1984, the coach with more FCS Playoff appearances than any coach in program history, after his one and only losing season (both conference and overall)?

EDIT: I know you can name some "reasons", but there are always "reasons" and THE reason. I think we all know THE reason, but, understandably, nobody in Bozeman wants to admit it.

Yes

Oh, good. Thank goodness.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

The floor is yours.
Pro tip: Throw "program culture" in a few of them.
Looking forward to his list. Throw in “toughness” in a few of them also.

There was only one reason-those kahki pants!
 
WaGriz4life said:
CDAGRIZ said:
ilovethecats said:
CDAGRIZ said:
Can you name 7 reasons not involving Ioanee why they parted ways with the winningest coach in about 50 years of program history, winner of half of the program's conference titles since 1984, the coach with more FCS Playoff appearances than any coach in program history, after his one and only losing season (both conference and overall)?

EDIT: I know you can name some "reasons", but there are always "reasons" and THE reason. I think we all know THE reason, but, understandably, nobody in Bozeman wants to admit it.

Yes

Oh, good. Thank goodness.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

The floor is yours.
Pro tip: Throw "program culture" in a few of them.
Looking forward to his list. Throw in “toughness” in a few of them also.
1. Program Culture
2. Toughness
3. Program Culture
4. Toughness
Etc...
 
ABQCat said:
WaGriz4life said:
CDAGRIZ said:
ilovethecats said:

Oh, good. Thank goodness.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

The floor is yours.
Pro tip: Throw "program culture" in a few of them.
Looking forward to his list. Throw in “toughness” in a few of them also.
1. Program Culture
2. Toughness
3. Program Culture
4. Toughness
Etc...

The true intangible hallmarks of a genius coach following The Plan. Most would comment on the losing record if it wasn’t so textbook. Credit to those who recognize a true artist at work.
 
EverettGriz said:
garizzalies said:
Is it just me, or have the C.A.T.S. had a very chaotic offseason for the coaching staff? Choach-speak aside, it seems like a mess. About half the staff, including both coordinators from opening day, are gone, right? Is Choach the only choach to have the same position from this time last year? Sounds like he’s losing the locker room and the admin shed.

Dunno garizz.

I think what we've seen may be rather regular, mundane activity during an active *SPE.




*Shit Pond Effect: A natural occurrence during the spring calendar months. Thought to lead to rather bizarre behavior and believed to be caused by shit sentiment floating upward and releasing toxic fumes, the effect can often instill a false heightened sense of self-assessment. See also "Pre-Season National Champions"

Also known as Spring Thaw amongst the Cats Program....

Also I thought they were moving McGee to Linebackers coach?
 
Back
Top