dub said:Why didn't he get a few downs with the 1s today? Would have made sense to me!
I kind of wonder how he would of played with the 1s today. IMO, I don't think he would have looked as good if he played with the 1s today.brewskis said:I think Hill's gonna be the guy. Seems to have the "it" factor right now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
dub said:Defense really good?
by Griz til I die » Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:38 pm
brewskis wrote: ↑Sat Apr 22, 2017 4:23 pm
I think Hill's gonna be the guy. Seems to have the "it" factor right now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I kind of wonder how he would of played with the 1s today. IMO, I don't think he would have looked as good if he played with the 1s today.
dub said:Defense really good?
TouchdownMontana said:I wonder why In evaluating the quarterbacks you don't let all 3 go against the number 1 defense and all 3 go against the two's. Seems it would be a better way to evaluate. Comments
grizaremoregooder said:dub said:Defense really good?
The offense is really, really bad.
I have watched a lot of practice and all three scrimmages. Phillips and Jensen are the clear leaders in the competition, and Jensen has looked better than Hill against the 2s all spring. There are only so many one snaps to go around and splitting evenly with two is hard enough. You saw today that neither got in to much of a rythym, adding a third to that mix would not be beneficial in my opinion.AZDoc said:TouchdownMontana said:I wonder why In evaluating the quarterbacks you don't let all 3 go against the number 1 defense and all 3 go against the two's. Seems it would be a better way to evaluate. Comments
I was thinking the same. I've seen many spring games at many levels...unless a clear guy, it almost always has something like that
grzz said:I have watched a lot of practice and all three scrimmages. Phillips and Jensen are the clear leaders in the competition, and Jensen has looked better than Hill against the 2s all spring. There are only so many one snaps to go around and splitting evenly with two is hard enough. You saw today that neither got in to much of a rythym, adding a third to that mix would not be beneficial in my opinion.AZDoc said:TouchdownMontana said:I wonder why In evaluating the quarterbacks you don't let all 3 go against the number 1 defense and all 3 go against the two's. Seems it would be a better way to evaluate. Comments
I was thinking the same. I've seen many spring games at many levels...unless a clear guy, it almost always has something like that
Also, some of what Hill got away with against the 2s would not have happened against ones. Sandry would have eaten him up too.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
grzz said:I have watched a lot of practice and all three scrimmages. Phillips and Jensen are the clear leaders in the competition, and Jensen has looked better than Hill against the 2s all spring. There are only so many one snaps to go around and splitting evenly with two is hard enough. You saw today that neither got in to much of a rythym, adding a third to that mix would not be beneficial in my opinion.AZDoc said:TouchdownMontana said:I wonder why In evaluating the quarterbacks you don't let all 3 go against the number 1 defense and all 3 go against the two's. Seems it would be a better way to evaluate. Comments
I was thinking the same. I've seen many spring games at many levels...unless a clear guy, it almost always has something like that
Also, some of what Hill got away with against the 2s would not have happened against ones. Sandry would have eaten him up too.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
MrTitleist said:grzz said:I have watched a lot of practice and all three scrimmages. Phillips and Jensen are the clear leaders in the competition, and Jensen has looked better than Hill against the 2s all spring. There are only so many one snaps to go around and splitting evenly with two is hard enough. You saw today that neither got in to much of a rythym, adding a third to that mix would not be beneficial in my opinion.AZDoc said:TouchdownMontana said:I wonder why In evaluating the quarterbacks you don't let all 3 go against the number 1 defense and all 3 go against the two's. Seems it would be a better way to evaluate. Comments
I was thinking the same. I've seen many spring games at many levels...unless a clear guy, it almost always has something like that
Also, some of what Hill got away with against the 2s would not have happened against ones. Sandry would have eaten him up too.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
So I guess you could say Caleb has quite the Hill to climb to become a starter.
fanofzoo said:Probably because stitt is really stubborn and phillips is his guy.
Delete your account. If I hadn't already driven your ass home from Butte I would leave you there.MrTitleist said:grzz said:I have watched a lot of practice and all three scrimmages. Phillips and Jensen are the clear leaders in the competition, and Jensen has looked better than Hill against the 2s all spring. There are only so many one snaps to go around and splitting evenly with two is hard enough. You saw today that neither got in to much of a rythym, adding a third to that mix would not be beneficial in my opinion.AZDoc said:TouchdownMontana said:I wonder why In evaluating the quarterbacks you don't let all 3 go against the number 1 defense and all 3 go against the two's. Seems it would be a better way to evaluate. Comments
I was thinking the same. I've seen many spring games at many levels...unless a clear guy, it almost always has something like that
Also, some of what Hill got away with against the 2s would not have happened against ones. Sandry would have eaten him up too.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
So I guess you could say Caleb has quite the Hill to climb to become a starter.
grzz said:Delete your account. If I hadn't already driven your ass home from Butte I would leave you there.MrTitleist said:grzz said:I have watched a lot of practice and all three scrimmages. Phillips and Jensen are the clear leaders in the competition, and Jensen has looked better than Hill against the 2s all spring. There are only so many one snaps to go around and splitting evenly with two is hard enough. You saw today that neither got in to much of a rythym, adding a third to that mix would not be beneficial in my opinion.AZDoc said:I was thinking the same. I've seen many spring games at many levels...unless a clear guy, it almost always has something like that
Also, some of what Hill got away with against the 2s would not have happened against ones. Sandry would have eaten him up too.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
So I guess you could say Caleb has quite the Hill to climb to become a starter.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk